Re: [STDS-802-16] LE Ad-hoc - 2.4GHz inclusion
Hi Marianna,
I would use 20dBm for the SS, and 30dBm for the BS. Antennas can be the same
as these for 5.8GHz.
Regards,
Yigal
-----Original Message-----
From: Marianna Goldhammer [mailto:marianna.goldhammer@alvarion.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 3:24 PM
To: yigall@runcom.co.il; STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: RE: [STDS-802-16] LE Ad-hoc - 2.4GHz inclusion
Igal,
If people agree, no problem to include 2.4GHz.
For this band we should consider powers according to the
FCC NPRM (FCC-03-223). Can you input the "System parameters"?
Regards,
Marianna
-----Original Message-----
From: Yigal Leiba [mailto:yigall@runcom.co.il]
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 1:08 PM
To: STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-16] LE Ad-hoc - First working document and questions
Hi Marianna,
I would propose to include 2.4GHz in the study, because
although it is a noisy band, it has very good propagation and
better mobility than 5.8GHz.
Best Regards,
Yigal
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-stds-802-16@listserv.ieee.org]On Behalf Of Marianna Goldhammer
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 8:56 PM
To: STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: [STDS-802-16] LE Ad-hoc - First working document and questions
Hi All,
I started the work by looking at System Parameters:
- for Tx power and antenna gain, I used data sheets of
existing products, from some 5 companies; took the
most used ones
- for SCa, OFDM,OFDMA, I used D3 to get
performance parameters.
In the attached document you will find a proposal for
system parameters, some questions, a list of main
interference scenarios to look at, and in the Annex
relevant extracts from D3.
Please:
- comment on proposed parameters
- address the "yellow text" and provide OFDM and OFDMA
parameters for lowest rate ACI
- comment on scenarios
- propose how to evaluate "service disruption" cases.
Regards,
Marianna
IEEE 802.16 LE Ad-Hoc Chair
P.S. Feel free to insert comments in text
<<C802.16-04_NNr0.doc>>
This mail was sent via mail.alvarion.com
****************************************************************************
********
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer
viruses.
****************************************************************************
********
This mail passed through mail.alvarion.com
****************************************************************************
********
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer
viruses.
****************************************************************************
********
This mail was sent via mail.alvarion.com
****************************************************************************
********
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer
viruses.
****************************************************************************
********