Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-16] Downlink PUSC subcarrier permutation

Hi Jun,

Thanks for the clarification.
I'll try to put one in this round (if my time permits).

Thanks,

Yossi


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
[mailto:owner-stds-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG]On Behalf Of Jun Wu
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 0:32
To: STDS-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-16] Downlink PUSC subcarrier permutation


Hi,Yossi,

I am referring to the section 8.4.6.1.3 (page 507) in RevD4,"The exact
partitioning into subchannels is according to Equation (100), called a
permutation formula. (To clarify the operation of this formula, an example
application is given subsequently in 8.4.6.2.3)", here what we talk about is
for downlink, right?  But in 8.4.6.2.3, the given example is for uplink
permutation. So my question is if we need a example for downlink PUSC?

Thanks,
Jun
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-stds-802-16@listserv.ieee.org]On Behalf Of Yossi Segal
Sent: 2004Äê4ÔÂ22ÈÕ 15:48
To: STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-16] Downlink PUSC subcarrier permutation


Hi Jun,

What section were you referring to?

Yossi

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-stds-802-16@listserv.ieee.org]On Behalf Of Jun Wu
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 18:38
To: STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: [STDS-802-16] Downlink PUSC subcarrier permutation


The 8.4.6.1.3 is not quite clear about the mapping of data subcarriers into
subchannel, I suggest to give an example as 8.4.6.1.4 to show how the
mapping is performed.

Thanks,
Jun Wu
ZTE San Diego