Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
DJ
I’m not sure either. In any case, the comments can be safely rejected since the noted problem has been dealt with through accepted comments 14 and 18.
Bob
-----Original Message-----
Can anyone enlighten me as to what the objections to comment 374 and 375 are?
Looking at table 4, the size of the type fields for HT==0 and HT!=0 are clearly swapped and should be the other way around. As currently written, the text of table 4 is out of step with figures 19 and 20 and the headers end up without byte alignment or enough bits to accommodate the encoding in table 6 in packet types in generic MPDUs.
So I'm perplexed as to what the objection is.
DJ
|