Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-16] Wireless Broadband Task Force of U.S. FCC Requests Comments



Roger,
I'd be happy to co-ordinate any comments on this issue.

Regards

Barry Lewis
Redline Communications
Regulatory Manager
Tel: +44 1276 479087
Cell: +44 7947 496588

mailto: blewis@redlinecommunications.com
www.redlinecommunications.com


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
[mailto:owner-stds-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG] On Behalf Of Roger B. Marks
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2004 8:04 AM
To: STDS-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [STDS-802-16] Wireless Broadband Task Force of U.S. FCC
Requests Comments

Folks,

The U.S. FCC's Wireless Broadband Access Task Force
<<http://www.fcc.gov/wbatf>http://www.fcc.gov/wbatf> has requested
comments, with a deadline of June 3.

The 802.18 TAG, meeting this week near Anaheim, CA, USA, plans to
prepare comments. Carl is inviting 802.16 to prepare input for them
by Wednesday of this week.

We have no formal process to do this, but we can submit something
informally. It would be helpful to have it coordinated.

Personally, I am extremely busy this week. Does anyone want to
volunteer to coordinate comments?

Roger


>Roger,
>
>If you check the last set of URLs at the bottom of this thread, it
>has a list of items the Commission would like comment on.
>
>Since .16 is not meeting with the other wireless groups in SoCal
>next week, if you can *try* to get some inputs to .18 by e-mail, say
>by Wednesday of next week, on .16's views on the questions the
>Commission is asking, it would be helpful. That would allow us to
>take .16's views into account as we formulate comments ... (I would
>hope that we could avoid WG partisanship/competition and stick to
>facts as much as possible).
>
>I realize that I'm asking you to try to get input from your group by
>e-mail before you meet, but with the comments due on June 03, it
>would be helpful for us to have your inputs while we're meeting - if
>possible. If this is not possible, I will schedule a conference call
>meeting of 802.18 for Monday, May 24th at 12:00 noon EDT to
>integrate/resolve .16's inputs against whatever .18 comes up with in
>SoCal next week.
>
>Remember, I have to notice conference call meetings 5 days in
>advance and whatever we produce has to pass a 5 day 802 EC review to
>file it as an 802.18 document - if that product is to be reviewed
>and blessed by CCIP (perhaps modified, perhaps as a joint filing?),
>we have to allow for that, too (that's why I'm asking you for input
>next week if it's at all possible ...)
>
>
>Regards,
>Carl R. Stevenson
>Chair, IEEE 802.18 Radio Regulatory Technical Advisory Group
>IEEE Liaison to ITU-R
>610-965-8799 (home office)
>610-712-3217 (fax mailbox)
>610-570-6168 (cellphone)
>Short Message Service: 6105706168@voicestream.net
>carl.stevenson@ieee.org


IMPORTANT NOTICE: This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The message may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify Redline immediately by email at postmaster@redlinecommunications.com.

Thank you.