Hi Jiho,
I have some comments on your assumptions
per your points:
1) As you stated FUSC uses all bandwidth
but so can the PUSC, so you may trade BW/footprint and
Interference as you like.
2) I am not sure the O-FUSC meets all the
spectral masks (I am not sure such an analyses has been done,
or at lease
I didn't see any), and it is gets very
hard implementing these much carriers (more processing in
some digital mechanisms
due to so much used BW). But if I am
wrong then you are right.
3) The assumption of the hit probability
must be between subchannels but if you use all the spectrum,
you are hitting all
subcarriers all the time anyway (and I am
not sure that the hit probability will be such a factor in
this case - where different permutations
will be used for the PUSC zones,
excluding the first 2 symbols).
4) Diversity gain difference is very
small as the PUSC already has clusters scattered all over the
spectrum, the difference will be between 24
clusters each with 2 subcarriers and 48
individual subcarriers.
And in any case you can switch zones just
after the first 2 PUSC symbols, which are heavily
coded, has better S/N and better
foot print when used in the 1/3
configuration.
Regards,
Yossi
Hi all,
I'm Jiho Jang from Samsung Electronics.
I have uploaded a material which describes the reasoning
for the proposal of OMI (operating mode identification) for
your information on http://temp.wirelessman.org.
Please find the uploaded file and look it over.
Thanks.
Regards,
Jiho Jang
|
Jiho Jang (Ph. D)
NTP Development Team (System
Lab. 2)
Telecommunication System
Division
Telecommunication Network
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
CO.,LTD
T. 82-31-279-3355
M. 016-9233-8541
jiho.jang@samsung.com
|