Hi Jiho,
I have some comments on your assumptions per your
points:
1) As you stated FUSC uses all bandwidth but so can the PUSC,
so you may trade BW/footprint and Interference as you
like.
2) I am not sure the O-FUSC meets all the spectral masks (I
am not sure such an analyses has been done, or at
lease
I didn't see any), and it is gets very hard implementing
these much carriers (more processing in some digital
mechanisms
due to so much used BW). But if I am wrong then you are
right.
3) The assumption of the hit probability must be between
subchannels but if you use all the spectrum, you are hitting
all
subcarriers all the time anyway (and I am not sure that the
hit probability will be such a factor in this case - where different
permutations
will be used for the PUSC zones, excluding the first 2
symbols).
4) Diversity gain difference is very small as the PUSC
already has clusters scattered all over the spectrum, the difference
will be between 24
clusters each with 2 subcarriers and
48 individual subcarriers.
And in any case you can switch zones just after
the first 2 PUSC symbols, which are heavily coded, has
better S/N and better
foot print when used in the 1/3 configuration.
Regards,
Yossi
Hi all,
I'm Jiho Jang from Samsung Electronics.
I have uploaded a material which describes the reasoning for
the proposal of OMI (operating mode identification) for your
information on http://temp.wirelessman.org.
Please find the uploaded file and look it over. Thanks.
Regards,
Jiho Jang
|
Jiho Jang (Ph. D)
NTP Development Team (System Lab. 2)
Telecommunication System
Division
Telecommunication Network
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.,LTD
T. 82-31-279-3355
M. 016-9233-8541
jiho.jang@samsung.com
|