Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

[STDS-802-16] missing 146r1 link



IEEE C802.16e-04/146r1 has been on the web since July 27. However,
the link was missing from the index file. I've just added the link:
        http://ieee802.org/16/tge/contrib/C80216e-04_146r1.pdf

Roger


At 11:55 -0500 2004-08-12, Phillip Barber wrote:
>I uploaded the r1 version of the document to the 16e contributions
>upload server in time for the reply comments prior to Session #32,
>with notification to the listserver and email verification to Roger.
>I cannot explain why it is not on the server now.
>
>I will re-send it to Roger to be applied to the 16e contributions
>directory and copy you on the email.
>
>Thanks,
>Phil
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <mailto:itzikk@RUNCOM.CO.IL>Itzik Kitroser
>To: <mailto:STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org>STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
>Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 10:32 AM
>Subject: Re: [STDS-802-16] release of IEEE P802.16e/D4
>
>Mo-Han,
>
>Regarding comment #312, I have search both in the upload directory
>and main directory and had only contribution 04/146(r0) available.
>
>Regards,
>Itzik.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From:
><mailto:owner-stds-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>owner-stds-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>[mailto:owner-stds-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG] On Behalf Of Mo-Han Fong
>Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 4:19 PM
>To: STDS-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>Subject: Re: [STDS-802-16] release of IEEE P802.16e/D4
>
>Hi Roger, Brian,
>I have noticed several comments that were adopted in the July
>meeting are not included in the D4 text. Those comments are:
>- #531 (contrib. 04/225r1)
>- #529 (the resolution stated in 80216-04_38r4.USR should be
>corrected to "adopt C80216e-04_220r1" (rather than 220) in addition
>to the modification stated in the resolution
>- #312 (it looks like contribution 04/146r0 was put into the D4 text
>rather than 146r1 as indicated in the resolution)
>Could you please advice if I should submit editorial(?) comments for
>the recirculation ballot #14c to address the above discrepancy, or
>the D4 text will be updated instead? Thanks.
>I would also like to extend my sincere thanks and appreciation for
>Ron and Itzik for their great work.
>Regards,
>Mo-Han
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-stds-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>[<mailto:owner-stds-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>mailto:owner-stds-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG]
>On Behalf Of Roger B. Marks
>Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 2:48 PM
>To: STDS-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>Subject: [STDS-802-16] release of IEEE P802.16e/D4
>
>The new draft P802.16e/D4-2004 ("Draft Amendment to IEEE Standard
>for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks - Part 16: Air Interface
>for Fixed and Mobile Broadband Wireless Access Systems- Amendment
>for Physical and Medium Access Control Layers for Combined Fixed and
>Mobile Operation in Licensed Bands") is now available:
>
><<http://ieee802.org/16/private/drafts/tge/P80216e_D4.zip>http://ieee802.org/16/private/drafts/tge/P80216e_D4.zip>
>This is the fourth draft in the P802.16e project. It is available
>using the 802.16 user name and password. For more information on
>password-protected access, see:
>
><http://ieee802.org/16/password.html>http://ieee802.org/16/password.html
>I've asked IEEE to put D4 up for sale, in place of D3. It should be
>in the catalog in a few days.
>Also posted is a Commentary database, including editor's notes, from
>the  Working Group Recirc Ballot #14b that led to this draft:
>
><<http://ieee802.org/16/docs/04/80216-04_38r4.zip>http://ieee802.org/16/docs/04/80216-04_38r4.zip>
>It's obvious that the 16e draft, now 270 pages long, is maturing. At
>the same time, our Chief Technical Editor, Ron Murias, has stepped
>up his expertise to make sure the editing work also matures. As the
>editing burdened has increased, Ron took the smart step of asking
>Itzik Kitroser to help out as Assistant Editor. Here is a note from
>Ron on the topic:
>  >I just wanted to let you know that once again, Itzik has been
>>unbelievably helpful through this process.  He split up the document
>  >the same way that REVd was done, which made it possible for us to share
>>the editing load.  He handled section 6 (and did an excellent job), and
>>he was always available for help.
>So: thanks to Ron and Itzik from all of us.
>Working Group Recirculation Ballot #14c, with this draft under
>review, will open later today.
>Cheers,
>Roger
>--
>Dr. Roger B. Marks  <<mailto:marks@nist.gov>mailto:marks@nist.gov>
>+1 303 497 3037 National Institute of Standards and
>Technology/Boulder, CO, USA Chair, IEEE 802.16 Working Group on
>Broadband Wireless Access
>         <<http://WirelessMAN.org>http://WirelessMAN.org>