Re: [STDS-802-16] a question on UGS

[weidong yang <weidong_yang@NAVINI.COM>]

Baraa,

 

In this case,  the overhead  due to DL_MAP & UL_MAP IEs could be very substantial if lots of conversations are going on.

(I did a search, and found this issue was raised in  IEEE C802.16e-04/368r2 by KT & Korea University)

I don't know whether other people also think this is a serious problem.

-----Original Message-----
From: Al Dabagh, Baraa [mailto:baraa.al.dabagh@INTEL.COM]
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 4:05 PM
To: STDS-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-16] a question on UGS

Correct.

 

---

From: owner-stds-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG [mailto:owner-stds-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG] On Behalf Of weidong yang
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 1:54 PM
To: STDS-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [STDS-802-16] a question on UGS

 

Dear all,

I have a question on UGS.

After reading the 802.16-2004 document, I come to the understanding

suppose we want to set up a voice conversation over 802.16-2004,  in every frame (let us assume

the frame duration is 10 ms)  where a downlink burst or an uplink burst for

that conversation is assigned, the assignment(s) has/have to be signified through DL_MAP and UL_MAP,

there isn't a way to make a "permanent" assignment for that conversation, so the assignments don't have to

be specifed each time in DL_MAP or UL_MAP. Is my understanding correct?

 

Weidong