[STDS-802-16] Problems with ranging process
- To: STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
- Subject: [STDS-802-16] Problems with ranging process
- From: Balchand N <balchand@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2005 13:58:30 +0530
- DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=Zc6bE9LtpCJDowK6tFI86ds8PRaLEaxjI8BEZTZMYIySERDoI/imp15SVgSVJsxMfZ7LloYj6AtxMYlpcX22r4TaCS9Ply556opkhpulIkCqp0OPnbGKFprhFF0zXa9CAaksm+TaEWizdx0JH5Yt7oW5wx9usYgdqlP3e3NcCa0=
- Reply-To: Balchand N <balchand@gmail.com>
- Sender: owner-stds-802-16@ieee.org
Hi,
With ref to 6.3.10.3(ofdma-based ranging) of Docs 882.16-2004 and
802.16-cor1-D1/D2
1. Where is the RNG-RSP message loacated during the initial ranging process
2. If RNG-RSP precedes a RNG-REQ as is the case here, what should be
the uplink channel ID field of the RNG-RSP message.
3. In case of RNG-RSP with success status, BW has to be allocated in
the uplink for the SS to transmit RNG-REQ message. To to this, the
CDMA_Allocation_IE does not have a field that specfy the location of
the RNG-REQ mesg.(It only seems to specify duration)
4. What is "RNG-RSP transmission on a CDMA_Allocation_IE" and why
should this kind of response have a continue status
regards
bala