Re: [STDS-802-16] [802SEC] Request to form a 802.19 Study Group
- To: STDS-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
- Subject: Re: [STDS-802-16] [802SEC] Request to form a 802.19 Study Group
- From: "Roger B. Marks" <r.b.marks@IEEE.ORG>
- Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 16:59:07 -0800
- In-Reply-To: <3BF285C347DD274FB835A67133811D4F0A37C8DB@fmsmsx408.amr.corp.intel.com>
- References: <3BF285C347DD274FB835A67133811D4F0A37C8DB@fmsmsx408.amr.corp.intel.com>
- Reply-To: "Roger B. Marks" <r.b.marks@IEEE.ORG>
Based on the information I have seen, I support Steve's proposal.
When a Study Group is formed, it is typically given wide notice and
publicity, and it calls widely for contributions. As a result, I
think it is likely that, beyond those who participate in the umbrella
group, the Study Group would attract a number of additional
participants who are drawn to the new activity. If a PAR is approved,
I wouldn't be surprised to see yet another increase in participation
as the project got underway.
Sponsor Ballot, of course, is completely independent.
Roger
At 11:29 AM -0800 05/11/17, Grow, Bob wrote:
>Steve:
>
>I think it is important to note that the small size of the vote below
>indicates to me there appears to be an unacceptable problem for assuring
>balance within the group developing the document, and the size of
>participants does not provide confidence that the requirement for ballot
>groups would be met when it went to Sponsor ballot.
>
>--Bob Grow
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Shellhammer, Steve [mailto:sshellha@QUALCOMM.COM]
>Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 4:54 PM
>To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>Subject: [802SEC] Request to form a 802.19 Study Group
>
>IEEE 802 Executive Committee,
>
>
>
> The 802.19 TAG voted to form a study group to develop a PAR
>and Five Criteria for either an IEEE Recommended Practice or IEEE Guide
>for predicting coexistence of wireless networks.
>
>
>
> The TAG has been developing an internal 802.19 that can be
>used as a starting point for this work.
>
>
>
> The vote in the TAG to form a study group was,
>
>
>
> Yes 4
>
> No 0
>
> Abstain 2
>
>
>
> I spoke with one other voting member who was unable to
>attend the 802.19 meeting but he stated he would have voted in favor if
>he could have attended the meeting today and will contribute to the
>project if approved.
>
>
>
> I would like to request that the motion to form an 802.19
>Study Group be placed on the Friday executive committee meeting agenda.
>
>
>
>Regards,
>
>Steve
>
>