Re: [STDS-802-16] Fwd: [802SEC] +++ LMSC P&P Revision Ballot +++ Document Numbers
Panyuh,
According to the subclause numbering scheme, there appear to be three
types of votes. However, the roll call vote is used only in meetings,
and it is subject to those rules. Therefore, I believe that it is
correct to say that "There are two types of votes in the WG. These
are votes at meetings and votes by letter ballot."
On the other hand, this would be more clear if 7.3.4.2.3 were
properly positioned, as 7.2.4.2.1.1 (a subclause under 7.2.4.2.1). I
will plan to make that comment.
Roger
At 12:58 PM +0900 06/05/05, Panyuh wrote:
>Dear all,
>In section 7.2.4.2, page 18 line numbers 23 it says "There are two types of
>votes in the WG. These are votes at meetings and votes by letter ballot."
>These two types of vote are 7.2.4.2.1 vote at meeting and 7.2.4.2.2 vote by
>letter ballot. But there is additional subsection in 7.2.4.2 which is
>7.3.4.2.3 roll call vote. So, isn't it appropriate to change the two ==>
>three?
>Thanks and regards
>Panyuh Joo
>Global Standards & Research
>Telecommunication R&D Center
>Telecommunication Network
>SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD
>TEL: 82-31-279-5096
>FAX: 82-31-279-5130
>Mobile : 82-16-9530-5096
>panyuh@samsung.com
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Kenneth Stanwood [mailto:KStanwood@CYGNUSCOM.COM]
>Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 8:43 AM
>To: STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
>Subject: Re: [STDS-802-16] Fwd: [802SEC] +++ LMSC P&P Revision Ballot +++
>Document Numbers
>
>Wow, it seems drastic to eliminate the requirement for a reasonable
>document numbering scheme. I'd prefer to see any problems fixed, but
>keep a numbering scheme that indicates the documents relate to an 802
>working group.
>
>Ken
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Roger B. Marks [mailto:r.b.marks@ieee.org]
>Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 2:22 AM
>To: STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
>Subject: [STDS-802-16] Fwd: [802SEC] +++ LMSC P&P Revision Ballot +++
>Document Numbers
>
>Per Mat's request below, I am informing you of another LMSC (802) P&P
>Revision Ballot. To see the ballot text, look at:
> http://ieee802.org/secmail/msg08157.html
>
>The proposal would delete the required format for document numbering.
>802.16 is largely following the format already, but many of the other
>WGs are not.
>
>Roger
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>Dear EC members,
>>
>>Attached you will find the text for an LMSC P&P revision ballot titled
>>'Document Numbers'. This ballot was approved at the Friday March 10,
>>2006 EC meeting. The text is identical to that presented at the meeting
>by
>>Pat Thaler. The purpose and rationale for the ballot are as given in
>the
>>attached ballot document.
>>
>>Ballot Duration: 4/29/2006 - 5/31/2006 @ 11:59 PM EDT
>>
>>WG/TAG chairs, please distribute this P&P revision ballot to your
>groups,
>>and invite them to comment through you. Please direct any comments on
>this
>>revision to the reflector for collection. I plan to handle any comment
>>resolution on this ballot at the Sunday July 16th,
>>2006 LMSC P&P review session.
>>
>>Thanks & Regards,
>>
>>Mat
>>
>>Matthew Sherman, Ph.D.
>>Senior Member Technical Staff
>>BAE Systems Network Enabled Solutions (NES)
>>Office: +1 973.633.6344
>>email: matthew.sherman@baesystems.com
>>