Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-16] FW: [STDS-802-16] [MMR-AH-UM] Announcing First meeting of Multihop Relay Usage Model Ad Hoc Group

Jerry,
 
Thank you for the response.
Another idea is one page description for each detailed usage model.
Contents of the one page description may be
 
1. Name of major model
2. Name of detailed model
3. Figure
4. summary description (may include outline of deployment scenario)
5. mobility and ownership
6. topology
7. RS characteristics
8. etc.
 
I think simple selection from several scenarios that would be discussed
in detail in the section 4-7 works for the one page description. 
 
Regards,
Asa
 
 

From: Sydir, Jerry [mailto:jerry.sydir@INTEL.COM]
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 8:58 AM
To: STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-16] FW: [STDS-802-16] [MMR-AH-UM] Announcing First meeting of Multihop Relay Usage Model Ad Hoc Group

Asa,

 

Thank you for providing input to the discussion. You bring up some key points on the organization of the document. We will discuss them in the meeting tomorrow. I have some initial thoughts to add to the discussion.

 

Your comment on including sections 4-7 as subsections of each of the usage model sections (3.x.x) raises a fundamental question on the organization of the document. I had considered structuring the document in that fashion, but concluded that there would be a lot of repetition in those sections from model to model. My feeling is that each of the models is unique in a few aspects of the topology, deployment strategy, attributes of the RSs uses, etc (sections 4-7), but they are not unique in all of them. For that reason I think that the document will be more concise if we describe out those points of uniqueness as part of the description of each usage model (without creating all of the subsections) and then summarized the complete set of topologies, deployment strategies, etc. in sections 4-7.

 

I agree with your idea that we have subsections for significant variations/examples of the major usage models. I would suggest that we have a common description of the model first, and then short sections describing the specific examples / variations.

 

Regards,

Jerry Sydir

 

From: Asa Masahito-c22106 [mailto:asa@MOTOROLA.COM]
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 10:28 PM
To: STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: [STDS-802-16] FW: [STDS-802-16] [MMR-AH-UM] Announcing First meeting of Multihop Relay Usage Model Ad Hoc Group

 

Jerry and all,

 

Thank you for announcing the ad hoc group discussion.

I have a suggestion on the table of contents or organization of the document.

My suggestion is mainly section three.

Suggested TOC is,

 

3.1 Throughput Enhancement

 3.1.1 Detailed model A

 3.1.2 Detailed model B

 3.1.3 Detailed model C

 3.1.4 ....
3.2 Coverage / Range Extension

 3.2.1 Detailed model E

 3.2.2 Detailed model F

 3.2.3 Detailed model G

 3.2.4 ....
3.3 Capacity Enhancement

 3.3.1 Detailed model I

 3.3.2 Detailed model J

 3.3.3 Detailed model K

 3.3.4 ....

 

I would like to make subsections and make a bit detail model.

For example,

3.1.1 detailed model A could be enhance model at cell edge.

3.1.2 detailed model B could be enhance model at valley of buildings

 

3.2.1 could be enhancement for isolated area and

3.2.2 could be enhancement at underground.

  (I like to define under ground as out of range area

   even if it is within the MMR-BS cell)

3.3.1 could be enhancement at temporally event.

 

Then I would suggest to discuss 

 - deployment strategy

 - mobility

 - owner ship

 - topology

 - link type

 - RS type 

 - antenna

for each detailed model.

I mean section 4 - 7 should be discussed in section 3.

 

I think collection of detailed models is the main point of Usage Models document.

 

I would like to hear your opinion.

 

Best Regards,

Asa

 

p.s.

I would like to include 3.4 mobile RS in section 3.1 TP enhancement.

Because mobile RS intends TP increase at inside the public transportation.  

  

From: Sydir, Jerry [mailto:jerry.sydir@INTEL.COM]
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 1:43 PM
To: STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: [STDS-802-16] [MMR-AH-UM] Announcing First meeting of Multihop Relay Usage Model Ad Hoc Group

Given the large number of folks interested in the Multihop Relay Usage Model Ad Hoc group, I’ve decided to follow the suggestions to use the 802.16 STDS exploder to carry on Ad Hoc group discussions instead of setting up a separate email list as I had indicated in earlier communications. Please append the prefix [MMR-AH-UM] to all communications meant for the ad-hoc group.

 

The first meeting (conference call) of the Ad Hoc group will be held on Thursday May 25, 2006 from 06:00 – 08:00 (AM) pacific time (GMT-08:00). Here is the bridge for the meeting: +1 916-356-2663, Bridge: 2, Passcode: 1157820.

 

I have uploaded some slides that I will use to kick off the meeting to the temporary upload directory. The document title is C80216j-06_UMAH-kick-off.ppt.

 

I have also uploaded a starting version of the harmonized contribution (the outline) to the same directory. The document title is C80216j-06_UMAHtemp.doc. Please review this document in advance and bring up any points of disagreement via email (over this email list) in order to help make the meeting more productive.

 

I’m looking forward to working with all of you to produce a harmonized usage model contribution.

 

Regards,

Jerry Sydir

Wireless Networking Lab, Intel Corp.

(408) 765 - 2215