| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
- CDMA allocation IE
format in table 290 (8.4.5.4.3) is 40 bits in size, even though it's mentioned
in table 287 as being only 32 bits. I am assuming tables 287/105 to be wrong,
table 290 to be correct.
- (minor text change)
Table 287 talks about 'PAPR reduction and safety zone allocation IE'. This
should be 'PAPR reduction/safety zone/sounding allocation
IE'.
-8.4.5.3.10 says: "This
IE shall only be used by a BS supporting HARQ for MS supporting HARQ" (the HARQ
and Sub-MAP IE is talked about here). Does this mean that sub-MAPs are only
allowed in HARQ capable BSs, even though HARQ and sub-MAP are essentially not
correlated? I would propose: "This IE shall only be used by a BS supporting HARQ
for MS supporting HARQ, when pointing to a HARQ MAP. This IE shall only be
used by a BS supporting sub-MAPs for MS supporting sub-MAPs, when pointing to a
sub-MAP".
-"See subclauses
following 8.4.5.4.3" should be "See subclauses following 8.4.5.4.4"
(Extended UIUC IE)
-Table 277a says for
Extended DIUC=0x07 "HARQ_Map_Pointer_IE". This should be "HARQ and Sub-MAP
pointer IE"
-8.4.5.4. Block
allocations are also done HARQ ack region (8.4.5.4.25)
-Table 302t. Should
<length> be interpreted as the length of the remainder of the IE (hence,
hardcoded to <3>)?
-Table 302v. Is the
duration field in number of frames with an allocation (take into account the
period), or just an absolute number of frames? We assume first option. Example:
if duration is 10, period p=1 (2^1 = 2), allocations shall be made during a
total time of 20 frames.
-Chapter 6.3.2.3.60
doesn't specifically say that for the sub-MAP case, the DL and UL compressed MAP
have to be appended. We assume this to be the case though, as this is what seems
to be shown in figure 23b.
-Table 277a is missing
the broadcast control pointer IE (Extended DIUC=0xA,
8.4.5.3.25)
Wim
Rouwet