| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Dear Ad Hoc participants, The next meeting of the Multihop Relay Usage Model Ad Hoc
Group will occur on Thursday June 8, 06:00 – 08:00 PDT (13:00
– 15:00 UTC). The bridge for the meeting is 916-356-2663, Bridge: 3, Passcode:
3465863. I have updated the draft to include modifications to the
outline that we agreed to in the June 1 meeting. It can be found in the
following location: http://dot16.org/CSUpload//upload/temp_db/C80216j%2d06_UMAHtemp_r2.doc. My plan is to assemble a list of issues that we need to
resolve in the next meeting via email discussion before the meeting. Please
review the document and bring up issues that you have with the technical
content (or missing content) of the document. (Editorial comments are welcome,
but we may want to hold off on making editorial changes until we are sure that
we are not changing the technical content). Please send your comments to the list before Wednesday 08:00
PDT. I will assemble a list of issues for us to resolve based on the comments
received up to that point. Below is the list of issues that have been raised in
emails, but were not resolved in that meeting. -
Should we create a
separate figure for each of the usage models -
In Figure 2 (the
link types figure) o
Should we show
connections between an MS and two RSs or RS and BS to indicate SHO o
The figure implies
that nomadic RSs can communicate to other nomadic RSs. Do we believe that the
temporary usage model suggest this type of usage? -
In Section 5.3 o
Are asymmetric routes
suggested by any of the usage models? o
Is the updated
figure on route types clear and is this the correct level of detail? -
Section 6.4 –
need to discuss again the level of detail that should be captured in this
section -
Section 6 in
general – is there any missing content? Best Regards, Jerry Sydir |