All,
Do we want to talk
about the Relay separation/isolation between Rx to Tx: in Frequency, Time,
Space (antenna directivity or physical separation) or any mixed between them?
The type of isolation will enforce the relay coverage gain (or interference),
delay, cost etc. this will lead to the best fit for each coverage area type,
this will lead to the question if we want one size (solution) that feet all?
If we want to keep this question open then we have to reflect that in the
document.
Zion
From: Asa
Masahito-c22106 [mailto:asa@MOTOROLA.COM]
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 4:07
AM
To:
STDS-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-16] [MMR-AH-UM]
Announcing 6/1/06 Meeting of Multihop Relay Usage Model Ad Hoc
Group
Jerry and
all,
My comments
are:
a) Uniformity
of titles in 3.1-3.4
I do not feel
uniformity of title in section 3.
So my
suggestion is
3.1
Outdoor coverage ....
3.2
In-building coverage ....
3.3
Temporally coverage ...
3.4
Mobile platform coverage ....
Can we say RS
characteristics in this section
since they are
missing in the crrent version?
b) 4.
Performance objective
Is it possible
to describe in general way
why
performance enhancement is expected ?
For
example,
- Link
is divided into shorter ranges by RSs to increase received signal
strength
-
RSs are located selecting better condition of field strength for
both receiving and transmitting
- RS
decodes information and re-transmits it with certain delay and frequency
scheduling
to obtain better performance. Interference mitigation is
expected.
-
etc.
Best
Regards,
Asa
From: Sydir,
Jerry [mailto:jerry.sydir@INTEL.COM]
Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 2:17
AM
To:
STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: [STDS-802-16] [MMR-AH-UM]
Announcing 6/1/06 Meeting of Multihop Relay Usage Model Ad Hoc
Group
Dear Ad Hoc
participants,
As we discussed in the previous
meeting the next meeting of the Multihop Relay Usage Model Ad Hoc Group will
occur on Thursday June 1, 06:00 – 08:00 PDT (13:00 – 15:00 UTC). (At the
meeting we will discuss varying the meeting times to accommodate people’s
schedules).
The bridge for the meeting is
916-356-2663, Bridge: 1, Passcode: 8272405.
I have updated the draft to
include modifications to the outline that we agreed to in the May 25 meeting
and to incorporate some preliminary text into the sections (based on content
from session 43 contributions). I encourage participants to review the draft
and to discuss the draft via email before the meeting. I will send out an
agenda for the meeting on Wednesday. The new draft is in the temp directory in
the upload server in the following location: C80216j-06_UMAHtemp_r1.doc
.
I look forward to a productive
discussion and to making progress toward our goal of creating a harmonized
contribution.
Best
Regards,
Jerry
Sydir