All,
Do we want to
talk about the Relay separation/isolation between Rx to Tx: in Frequency,
Time, Space (antenna directivity or physical separation) or any mixed
between them? The type of isolation will enforce the relay coverage gain
(or interference), delay, cost etc. this will lead to the best fit for
each coverage area type, this will lead to the question if we want one
size (solution) that feet all? If we want to keep this question open then
we have to reflect that in the document.
Zion
From: Asa
Masahito-c22106 [mailto:asa@MOTOROLA.COM]
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 4:07
AM
To:
STDS-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-16]
[MMR-AH-UM] Announcing 6/1/06 Meeting of Multihop Relay Usage Model Ad Hoc
Group
Jerry and
all,
My
comments are:
a) Uniformity
of titles in 3.1-3.4
I do not
feel uniformity of title in section 3.
So my
suggestion is
3.1
Outdoor coverage ....
3.2
In-building coverage ....
3.3
Temporally coverage ...
3.4
Mobile platform coverage ....
Can we say
RS characteristics in this section
since they
are missing in the crrent version?
b) 4.
Performance objective
Is it
possible to describe in general way
why
performance enhancement is expected ?
For
example,
-
Link is divided into shorter ranges by RSs to increase received signal
strength
-
RSs are located selecting better condition of field strength for
both receiving and transmitting
- RS
decodes information and re-transmits it with certain delay and frequency
scheduling
to obtain better performance. Interference mitigation is
expected.
-
etc.
Best
Regards,
Asa
From:
Sydir, Jerry [mailto:jerry.sydir@INTEL.COM]
Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 2:17
AM
To:
STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: [STDS-802-16] [MMR-AH-UM]
Announcing 6/1/06 Meeting of Multihop Relay Usage Model Ad Hoc
Group
Dear Ad Hoc
participants,
As we discussed in the
previous meeting the next meeting of the Multihop Relay Usage Model Ad Hoc
Group will occur on Thursday June 1, 06:00 – 08:00 PDT (13:00 –
15:00 UTC). (At the meeting we will discuss varying the meeting times to
accommodate people’s schedules).
The bridge for the meeting is
916-356-2663, Bridge: 1, Passcode: 8272405.
I have updated the draft to
include modifications to the outline that we agreed to in the May 25
meeting and to incorporate some preliminary text into the sections (based
on content from session 43 contributions). I encourage participants to
review the draft and to discuss the draft via email before the meeting. I
will send out an agenda for the meeting on Wednesday. The new draft is in
the temp directory in the upload server in the following location:
C80216j-06_UMAHtemp_r1.doc
.
I look forward to a productive
discussion and to making progress toward our goal of creating a harmonized
contribution.
Best
Regards,
Jerry
Sydir