Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-16] MMR usage models

I agree with Panyuh.

 

Ken

 

From: Panyuh [mailto:panyuh@SAMSUNG.COM]
Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2006 5:52 PM
To: STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-16] MMR usage models

 

Hi all,

Sure, it is Out of scope.

BR

Panyuh Joo

From: °ûº´Àç [mailto:bjkwak@etri.re.kr]
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 9:15 AM
To: STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-16] MMR usage models

 

I believe that is out of the scope of 802.16j. The MMR should be

backward compatable in the sense that the MS specification

should not be changed. Can we allow MS-to-MS communication

without changing the current specification?

 

BJ


-----¿øº» ¸Þ½ÃÁö-----
From: "Ramzi Tka" <ramzi.tka@GMAIL.COM>
From Date: 2006-06-24 ¿ÀÈÄ 7:08:48
To: "STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org" <STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org>
Cc:
Subject: [STDS-802-16] MMR usage models

Hi,
When reading "Harmonized Contribution on 802.16j (Mobile Multihop Relay) Usage Models ? Revision R4". We can see that a the general architecture is based o na PMP architecture assuming a possible relaying through FRS,NRS or MRS. Could we consider a usage model where direct communications can occur between MSSs. In other words, could we consider a "mesh usage model". In which case, we can find all types of links especially MSS-MSS links. This will be useful when applicative traffic should occur between MSSs or between MMS and  FRS/NRS/MRS. There is no need that the traffic transit via the BS.
What do you think about this?
Best regards
Ramzi TKA