Re: [STDS-802-16] [MMR-AH-UM] Please review harmonized usagemodelcontribution author list
Dear Jerry and all,
Following the email discussion started about a month ago, I agree with
the opinion that we should not prohibit MS-RS-MS communications in the usage
scenario document. Further, I think the new text in section 4.4 given below
should be applicable not only to the military scenarios.
"... a station may be able to operate as either a BS or RS and may need to
switch roles in response to conditions in the field such as an RS losing
connectivity to its upstream RS or MMR-BS.."
In short, I think it is very not efficient to have traffic going through
more hops just to reach the BS.
rgds,
Peng-Yong Kong
-----Original Message-----
From: J Kim [mailto:macsbug@RESEARCH.ATT.COM]
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 2:15 AM
To: STDS-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-16] [MMR-AH-UM] Please review harmonized usage
modelcontribution author list
Jerry and all.
I think the added sentence at the beginning of Section 6.3 (was 5.3)
"In all of the usage models described in section 3, all data
communications occur between the MMR-BS and MSs through zero or more
RSs."
is unnecessary along the lines of the discussions in the attached mail.
At the current stage and especially for usage models, I see no reason to
limit all traffic back to MMR-BS.
I'm assumming I'm not the only one reading it to mean all user traffic
must come to BS?
I suggest removing it.
Bests.
"J" Kim
________________________________
From: Sydir, Jerry [mailto:jerry.sydir@INTEL.COM]
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 3:30 PM
To: STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: [MMR-AH-UM] Please review harmonized usage model contribution
author list
Dear Ad Hoc participants,
In the latest revision of the harmonized Usage Model contribution, I
have added the list of the ad hoc participants as co-authors of the
document. I've included all those who expressed interest in the ad hoc
group, participated in the calls, or sent emails on the mailing list
expressing opinions on the contents. Please take a look at the list and
send me an email if you have participated and I have missed you, or if
you do not wish to have your name in the list. (Its probably sufficient
to reply to me directly to me).
The document can be found in the following location:
http://dot16.org/CSUpload//upload/temp_db/C80216j%2d06_UMAHtemp_r5.doc
<http://dot16.org/CSUpload/upload/temp_db/C80216j%2d06_UMAHtemp_r5.doc>
.
Best Regards,
Jerry Sydir