Dear Lepidus,
Glad to receive your mail.
I does not aware the difference between my understanding and
Geunhwi¡¦s comment. If a MS supports the capability of FBSS/MDHO, it shall
perform the autonomous neighbor cell scanning all the time without the
instruction by BS. Therefore, when the BS send the MOB_SCN-RSP to MS with Scan
duration set as zero, this message is to instruct the MS to ¡§report¡¨ the
scanning results. Then MS will report the results based on its signal quality
database.
I suppose BS can know if the MS supports FBSS/MDHO through the ¡¥Handover
supported¡¦ field in REG-REQ/RSP message, and its detail is available in
11.7.13.5 in Cor2/D2. Once the BS know the MS will support the FBSS/MDHO, it¡¦s
reasonable to assume the MS will perform the autonomous neighbor cell scanning.
The aforementioned comments are my understanding, any correction
or amendment will be much appreciated. Thank you very much.
Best Regards,
I-Kang
=================================================
I-Kang Fu IKFu@itri.org.tw
New Mobile Access Tech. Dept.
Information & Communications Research Labs
Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI), Taiwan
=================================================
From: Lepidus_Chang@mtk.com.tw
[mailto:Lepidus_Chang@mtk.com.tw]
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 2:50 PM
To: I-Kang Fu
Cc: STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-16] Question on unsolicited MOB_SCN-RSP message.
(16e-2005)
Hello
I-Kang,
Thanks for the reply.
In
case the "MS autonomous neighbor cell scanning" is not instructed by
MOB_SCN-RSP (including both unsolicited or not), the
expected
action for MS which receives unsolicited MOB_SCN-RSP message becomes undefined
in the current specifications.
Per
the comments from Geunhw Lim in 80216-07_013r2.cmt (comment #25),
"Without
the allocated scanning duration, MS could report the measurement from
autonomous scanning. The current spec allows that a BS could deny the
allocation of scanning interval but request the measurement result which MS has
from background scanning, through a MOB_SCN-RSP message."
In
this comment, the unsolicited MOB_SCN_RSP message would expect MS to perform
autonomous scanning. As there is only one
section
describing "MS autonomous neighboring cell scanning" throughout the
current specifications, I would not think Geunhw's understanding
is
the same as yours on "MS autonomous neighbor cell scanning is not
instructed by MOB_SCN-RSP".
On
your reply item 3, "Therefore, I think the MS which does not perform FBSS/MDHO may still
be instructed to report its scanning results by BS."
In
case the expected action for MS which receives unsolicited MOB_SCN-RSP message
is not the "MS autonomous neighbor cell scanning" defined
in
Section 8.4.13.1.3, the expected action for MS is undefined. In case the
expected action is defined in Section 8.4.13.1.3, it violates the requirement
that
autonomous
scanning is restricted to MS which supports FBSS/MDHO.
As
I find this issue unclear on both ways, I would love to learn your opinions on
this issue. Any other comments are also appreciated.
Best
regards,
Lepidus.
|
I-Kang Fu
<IKFu@ITRI.ORG.TW>
2007/03/04
12:40 PM
½Ð¦^«H µ¹ I-Kang
Fu
|
¦¬¥ó¤H¡G
STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
°Æ¥»§Û°e¡G
¥D¦®¡G
Re: [STDS-802-16] Question on unsolicited
MOB_SCN-RSP message. (16e-2005)
|
----- °T®§¨Ó¦Û
"I-Kang Fu" <IKFu@itri.org.tw> (¦ì©ó Sun, 4 Mar 2007 12:40:15 +0800)
-----
±H¥ó¤H:
|
<STDS-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
|
¥D¦®:
|
Re:
[STDS-802-16] Question on unsolicited MOB_SCN-RSP message. (16e-2005)
|
## Due to some format mismatch in my last mail, I re-send this
again. Sorry for your inconvenience. ##
Dear Lepidus,
I would like to share my understanding for your reference. Any
correction or amendment on my replies are welcome and appreciated.
1. The ¡§MS autonomous neighbor cell
scanning¡¨ is not instructed by MOB_SCN-RSP, it¡¦s different from the normal
scanning procedure defined in 6.3.22.1.2. According to section 8.4.13.1.3 in IEEE
Std 802.16 Cor2/D2, the MS shall autonomously scan the preamble transmitted by
neighboring cells if it supports the capability of FBSS/MDHO. So that MS can
continuously maintain the signal quality database to decide whether the
neighbor BSs should be added into the diversity set.
2. Yes, the MS autonomous neighbor cell
scanning shall be performed only when the FBSS/MDHO is supported.
3. According to section 6.3.22.1.2, it says
that the serving BS may also send MOB_SCN-RSP message unsolicited. In this
case, BS will set Scan duration as zero to trigger MS to report scanning
result. Therefore, I think the MS which does not perform FBSS/MDHO may still be
instructed to report its scanning results by BS.
4. Yes, I think so. I think scanning the
preamble transmitted in different carrier frequency is not within the scope of
autonomous neighbor cell scanning. For this case, the normal scanning procedure
should be used.
Best Regards,
I-Kang
=================================================
I-Kang Fu IKFu@itri.org.tw
New Mobile Access Tech. Dept.
Information & Communications Research Labs
Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI), Taiwan
=================================================
From: Chao_Ming Chang
[mailto:Lepidus_Chang@MTK.COM.TW]
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2007 2:55 PM
To: STDS-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [STDS-802-16] Question on unsolicited MOB_SCN-RSP message.
(16e-2005)
Hello all,
Regarding the MOB_SCN-RSP message defined in IEEE 802.16e-2005 and
revised in Cor2/D2
(page 144 of P80216_Cor2_D2.pdf), the Scan duration is set to be zero. In this
case,
1. Does the MS receiving MOB_SCN-RSP have to perform "MS autonomous
neighbor cell scanning" defined
in Section 8.4.13.1.3?
2. In case the answer to the first question is positive, does it applicable
only when the MS supports FBSS/MDHO?
because MS is requested to support autonomous neighbor cell scanning when it
supports FBSS/MDHO as specified in
Section 8.4.13.1.3 (page 647 of 16e-2005).
3. Would you think it is better to precisely restrict that unsolicited
MOB_SCN-RSP message is only applicable to MS which
supports FBSS/MDHO in Section 6.3.22.1.2 "MS scanning of neighbor
BSs" which defines the unsolicited MOB_SCN-RSP
message on page 144 of Cor2/D2?
4. At last, in Section 8.4.13.1.3, it said that "For autonomous scanning
procedure, the MS shall perform neighboring cell scanning
via preamble detection for neighbor cells in the same carrier frequency."
Is it the same carrier frequency with the serving BS?
Any comments or replies on the questions are highly appreciated. Thanks.
Best regards,
Lepidus.
*************
Email Confidentiality Notice ********************
The
information contained in this e-mail message (including any attachments) may be
confidential, proprietary, privileged, or otherwise exempt from disclosure
under applicable laws. It is intended to be conveyed only to the designated
recipient(s). Any use, dissemination, distribution, printing, retaining or
copying of this e-mail (including its attachments) by unintended recipient(s)
is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not an intended
recipient of this e-mail, or believe that you have received this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender immediately (by replying to this e-mail),
delete any and all copies of this e-mail (including any attachments) from your
system, and do not disclose the content of this e-mail to any other person.
Thank you!¥»«H¥ó¥i¯à¥]§t¤u¬ã°|¾÷±K¸ê°T¡A«D«ü©w¤§¦¬¥óªÌ¡A½Ð¤Å¨Ï¥Î©Î´¦ÅS¥»«H¥ó¤º®e¡A¨Ã½Ð¾P·´¦¹«H¥ó¡C
This email may contain confidential information. Please do not use or disclose
it in any way and delete it if you are not the intended recipient.