Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-16] Fwd: [STDS-802-16] 802 PARs for November EC agenda

 

 

From: Feder, Peretz (Peretz)
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 1:14 AM
To: 'Panyuh Joo'; STDS-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: [STDS-802-16] Fwd: [STDS-802-16] 802 PARs for November EC agenda

 

Not convinced Panyuh:

 

 

See below.

From: Panyuh Joo [mailto:panyuh.joo@GMAIL.COM]
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 1:05 AM
To: STDS-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [STDS-802-16] Fwd: [STDS-802-16] 802 PARs for November EC agenda

 

Feder,

 

The assumption is not likely right.

Each standard project is identified as related tasks whether it is revision or amendment or corrigenda or errata or new standard.

That is the same reason whay 16j upload contributions into 16j, but not into 16e/rev2/etc..

 

But when 802.16j is published, it too will amend 802.16Rev2 like 802.16g just did.


You can see the one to one match for each projects from year 2001, whether it is completed, obsoleted or active, etc...

 

They all became part of Rev2, so will 802.16j and according to my understanding of the 802.16m PAR, so should it.

The 802.16m PAR says amendment all over it. Amendment can’t be a new standard.

Hope this could help your understanding.

 

Need more convincing. PAR language is king.

panyuh