Re: [STDS-802-16] Inconsistency between the TGm closing report and call for SDD contributions
Sassan,
A closing report is NOT the complete record of a meeting and should
never be looked at that way. That is the function of the meeting
minutes, which regrettably have not yet been posted yet.
As you might recall, during the last session, the subject of the impact
of multi-antenna techniques on the frame structure was discussed and in
fact we had some contributions to that effect. As part of those
discussions and also later when we specifically discussed this Call for
Contributions it was mentioned and agreed that the SDD Call for
Contributions should include "multi-access and multi-antenna techniques
but only on issues relating to the frame structures." That discussion
is captured in the minutes and I believe that is exactly what the fourth
bullet of the CfC says.
Brian
-----Original Message-----
From: Ahmadi, Sassan [mailto:sassan.ahmadi@INTEL.COM]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 4:40 PM
To: STDS-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [STDS-802-16] Inconsistency between the TGm closing report and
call for SDD contributions
To: 802.16 WG TGm Chair
Dear Brian,
I noticed that the call for SDD contributions for Jan'08 (IEEE
802.16m-07/047) is inconsistent with the TGm group decision in Nov'07
(reflected in your closing report IEEE 802.16m-07/045r2) in inclusion of
"multi-antenna techniques" topic. According to the closing report and my
recollection of the meeting agreements, the "multi-antenna techniques"
topic was not supposed to be included in the call for SDD proposals in
Jan'08.
I request that you kindly revise the call for SDD proposal and make it
consistent with the closing report and the agreement in Nov'07.
Thanks and Regards
-Sassan Ahmadi, Ph.D.
Intel Corporation