Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-16] FW: [STDS-802-16] TGm Call for SDD Comments and Contributions



Title: RE: [STDS-802-16] TGm Call for SDD Comments and Contributions

Avi,

 

The proposal may very well suggest changes to sections other than just section 10 (MAC) or section 11 (PHY). The work items do not constrain the sections to be amended. Indeed, I would absolutely expect any contributions on Security* to propose additions to section 12 Security in the SDD, just as an example.

 

In your list of other potentially affected sections you forgot to mention section 8 (among a few others). I give this as an example because, depending on if the change is to the higher part of the protocol stack or the low part, that will determine if its MAC or PHY.

 

And therein lies the problem. It is going to be somewhat subjective in determining if something is ‘MAC’, ‘PHY’ or ‘Both’ when the changes are proposed for sections other than the easily identifiable section 10 or section 11.

 

For some of the contributions topical areas, like Multi-Carrier Operation*, the author may have some difficulty making his subjective assessment.

 

The critical thing to remember when assigning this ‘value’ to the comment and contribution is that it is used purely to categorize the contribution so that the contribution can be assigned to the most relevant group, MAC or PHY, for resolution at Session 57. So the author is best served by choosing right as he/she has the most informed group reviewing their work!

 

Unfortunately the tag PHY & MAC aspects of enhanced MBS*--while helping us determine the work item addressed and assisting in assignment of the associated contribution to the appropriate agenda item--is not specific enough to determine which group, MAC or PHY, to assign the contribution for resolution.

 

Thanks,
Phillip Barber
Chief Scientist
Wireless Advanced Research and Standards
Huawei Technologies Co., LTD.

Rapporteur Group Chair Coordinator, IEEE 802.16 TGm


From: Avi Freedman [mailto:avif@HEXAGONLTD.COM]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 9:45 AM
To: STDS-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-16] FW: [STDS-802-16] TGm Call for SDD Comments and Contributions

 

Phil,

Thanks for the detailed clarification.  I wonder if you can clarify one more point, so it is really crystal clear.

 

When you say that for the topics:

PHY & MAC aspects of Location Services*

PHY & MAC aspects of enhanced MBS*

Multi - Carrier Operation*

Security*

Multi-Radio Coexistence*

the author should clearly segment and identify the work as PHY or MAC

 

do you mean that the contributions should only be for text for chapters 10 (MAC) and 11 (PHY) and not to chapters  14, 15, 12, 19 and 17 of the SDD?   These are chapters that involve both PHY and MAC and segmentation may not be appropriate for them.

 

Avi

 


From: Phillip Barber [mailto:pbarber@BROADBANDMOBILETECH.COM]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 12:03 AM
To: STDS-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [STDS-802-16] FW: [STDS-802-16] TGm Call for SDD Comments and Contributions

 

All TGm participants,

 

Brian has asked me to remind the participants about one or two things from the TGm Call for Contributions and Comments.

 

First, the due date for the CfC&C is rapidly approaching: Sept 5, 2008

 

Second, all contributions MUST BE ACCOMPANIED/REFERENCED BY AN APPROPRIATE COMMENT. As usual, use the Commentary Tool to create and export your comments. Upload your exported comments to the TGm upload directory at http://dot16.org/upload/

 

Use ballot id ‘tgmsdd’ in your comments. The document under review is 802.16m-08/003r4.

 

Use of the Commentary Tool to file comments is also required for comments EVEN WITHOUT A CONTRIBUTION.

 

Remember that contributions are intended to supplement comments only when the Problem discussion and/or Proposed Remedy are so substantial as to require the contribution format for appropriate presentation. So, please do not file a contribution to propose minor editorial or technical changes. The commentary tool is well suited to such purpose.

 

To reiterate: comments are the preferred medium for requesting changes to the SDD text. Only submit a contribution against the SDD text if the commentary tool proves unsuitable to the complexity of your presentation.

 

Third, the CfC&C calls for specific identification of the CfC topic addressed in a contribution:

 

Contributions should follow the guidelines below:

.

.

.

• Specify on the cover page (in the “Re:” or “Venue:” box) which of the above mentioned topics the contribution pertains to.

.

.

.

 

The valid entries for the Re: field on the contribution cover page are:

 

SDD Session 56 Cleanup           [related to CfC&C item: Newly accepted text output from the Rapporteur Groups in Session #56, primarily in Sections 4, 6, 8, 10 and 11]

PHY: Text

PHY: Link

PHY: HARQ

PHY: MIMO

MAC: HO

MAC: Idle Mode

MAC: Sleep Mode

MAC: Data Plane

MAC: Network Entry

MAC: Connection Establishment & Maintenance

PHY & MAC aspects of Location Services*

PHY & MAC aspects of enhanced MBS*

Multi - Carrier Operation*

Security*

Multi-Radio Coexistence*

For these last five italicized* topics the author should clearly segment and identify the work as PHY or MAC

 

So, a valid entry for the Re: field would look something like:

Re: PHY: Link; in response to the TGm Call for Contributions and Comments 802.16m-08/033 for Session 57

 

Fourth, embed these identification codes in your comment as well. Comments and contributions will be organized by the identified topic and resolved during Session 57 in appropriate PHY or MAC session. It is imperative that both comments and contributions proposed SDD text have PROPER EDITORIAL INSTRUCTIONS indicating exactly how to add/remove/modify text, exactly where in the SDD document.

 

Fifth, the RG and Ad-hoc Chairs will be filing consensus contributions on behalf of the following Rapporteur Groups, by the deadline:

PHY: Text

PHY: Link

PHY: HARQ

PHY: MIMO

MAC: HO

MAC: Idle Mode

MAC: Sleep Mode

DO NOT BE ALARMED! Harmonization and consensus development will continue all the way up to the Session 57 start. RG participants will continue to have opportunity to refine the consensus contribution text, and accomplish consensus on topics when not already achieved. If your text is included in the consensus contributions then you may choose not to file your own comments and contributions. In any event, participants that seek a change to these consensus contributions should file Reply Comments during the Reply Comment period, rather than filing competing contributions. This goes for both small editorial changes as well as participants seeking to include otherwise excluded text. Use of the Reply Comment process will ensure a more orderly and consistent resolution on these topics. Competing comments and contributions to the consensus document, comments and contributions not submitted as Reply Comments may very well be ruled out-of-scope of the Call for Contributions and Comments for all of the topics remanded to RG and Ad-hocs for processing.

 

A few of these RG and Ad-hoc groups will almost certainly be renewed for post-Session 57 operation. For instance, the MAC HO ad-hoc is unlikely to resolve all issues of legacy 16m/16e handover and inter-technology handover prior to Session 57 finish. But expect that this is the exception, not the rule. PHY topics especially require resolution during this meeting Session in order to keep on the project plan, enable the issuance of the planned call for Stage 3 contributions for Session 58. RG and Ad-hoc Chairs will be making recommendations on renewal prior to the end of Session 57. So, participants should expect that comments and contributions related to continued RGs and Ad-hocs will be deferred to those groups for post-Session 57 work.

 

Regardless, be aware that there will be extremely limited time to discuss ANY contribution at Session 57. There is a HUGE number of topics that were out for RG and Ad-hoc work during this inter-Session interim period and limited time and facilities will simply not allow such debate on the agenda, in addition to our other critical agenda items. Plan appropriately.

 

Sixth, obviously the restrictions and process for RG and Ad-hoc material does not apply to those items that were not part of any RG or Ad-hoc harmonization efforts:

SDD Session 56 Cleanup           [related to CfC&C item: Newly accepted text output from the Rapporteur Groups in Session #56, primarily in Sections 4, 6, 8, 10 and 11]

MAC: Data Plane

MAC: Network Entry

MAC: Connection Establishment & Maintenance

PHY & MAC aspects of Location Services*

PHY & MAC aspects of enhanced MBS*

Multi - Carrier Operation*

Security*

Multi-Radio Coexistence*

Comments and contributions related to these topics will be reviewed, and for SDD Session 56 Cleanup items resolved during the Session. Expect the creation of Rapporteur Groups to continue harmonization and consensus development on the unresolved topics for the period after Session 57 till Session 58 in Dallas.

 

On behalf of the participants of the RGs and Ad-hocs, I want to convey my sincere thanks to all of the RG and Ad-hoc Chairs for their dedication and hard work during this interval. We had a substantial number of concurrent projects underway--many of substantial complexity and contestation--during this inter-Session interim period. Their significant efforts have made this, what appears to be, a productive cycle. We all deserve recognition for this accomplishment. But we are in the home stretch now and we need to finish delivery of our joint efforts. It would be a shame to have things fall apart in the endgame. So no time to rest. Let’s make this last tenday count!

 

Thanks,
Phillip Barber
Chief Scientist
Wireless Advanced Research and Standards
Huawei Technologies Co., LTD.

Rapporteur Group Chair Coordinator, IEEE 802.16 TGm


From: Kiernan, Brian G [mailto:Brian.Kiernan@INTERDIGITAL.COM]
Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2008 9:09 PM
To: STDS-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-16] TGm Call for SDD Comments and Contributions

 

I realize many of you would like as much time as possible to develop your comments and contributions, but I do think 80 years is a tad excessive.

Submissions are due no later than 5 September 2008 AOE

Brian

-----Original Message-----
From: Kiernan, Brian G
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2008 5:57 PM
To: Roger B. Marks; STDS-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [STDS-802-16] TGm Call for SDD Comments and Contributions

Some of you may have noticed that that the latest version of the 802.16m SDD, <http://www.ieee802.org/16/tgm/docs/80216m-08_003r4.zip> has been posted on the TGm web page. In conjunction with this, a Call for Comments and Contributions, <http://www.ieee802.org/16/tgm/docs/80216-08_033.pdf> for session #57 has also been posted.

Submissions are due no later than 5 September 2088 AOE.

Brian