Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-16] [TGm] Editorial comments in SDD commentary DB, revision 1

Title: [TGm] Editorial comments in SDD commentary DB, revision 1

Jerry,

 

Per your request, comment 167 will be excised from the list of Editorial comments for bulk motion processing and will resolved independently.

 

Thanks,
Phillip Barber
Chief Scientist
Wireless Advanced Research and Standards
Huawei Technologies Co., LTD.


Rapporteur Group Chair Coordinator, IEEE 802.16 TGm

 

From: Sydir, Jerry [mailto:jerry.sydir@INTEL.COM]
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2008 6:03 PM
To: STDS-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-16] [TGm] Editorial comments in SDD commentary DB, revision 1

 

Dear Shkumbin and all,

 

In reviewing comments, I was looking at comment 167, which is in your list of editorial comments. This comment proposes replacing the terms “DL subframe” and “UL subframe” with “DL zone” and “UL zone” respectively. Although I agree that the term subframe is being used in a different manner in 16m, I’m wondering if “DL zone” is the accepted replacement for the part of the frame that is used for DL transmissions. I can’t find it defined in the current SDD. Is this a term that has been agreed to? Perhaps we should take this comment out of the bulk approval list in order to discuss it explicitly.

 

Best Regards,

Jerry Sydir

 

From: Shkumbin Hamiti [mailto:shkumbin.hamiti@NOKIA.COM]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 1:45 PM
To: STDS-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [STDS-802-16] [TGm] Editorial comments in SDD commentary DB, revision 1

 

Dear colleagues,

I have just uploaded the Rev 1 of the SDD commentary DB, the IEEE 802.16m-08/034r1. You can find it here: http://dot16.org/ul//upload/TGm_db/802.16m%2d08_034r1.zip

This revision contains one file that I had missed in the first upload and few other files that were uploaded late.
In addition, and quite important, you will find a classification of comments. Please note that for those comments that had no classification by the author I have assumed a certain tag. I expect that there may be some misallocations, so I kindly ask you to check and if you disagree please let me know and I will correct it.

There are 160 editorial comments, and as usual there will be a motion to approve all of them in a batch. Since we would like to have this motion proposed quite early in the session I kindly ask to check the comment numbers below and let me know if you disagree on any of those.

Here is the rough text that will be proposed as a motion:

To accept the following list of comments in the IEEE 802.16m-08/034r1:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, 14, 15, 19, 21, 30, 37, 38, 42, 44, 51, 91, 111, 112, 115, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 139, 141, 143, 144, 146, 148, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 157, 167, 168, 173, 174, 176, 177, 178, 180, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 190, 191, 192, 193, 196, 197, 200, 201, 204, 205, 206, 208, 209, 210, 211, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 219, 222, 223, 226, 228, 230, 232, 234, 235, 239, 246, 252, 254, 256, 258, 259, 260, 265, 274, 289, 290, 304, 305, 308, 316, 319, 336, 339, 340, 342, 345, 346, 347, 348, 349, 360, 361, 362, 363, 364, 365, 366, 367, 372, 373, 374, 376, 378, 379, 380, 381, 382, 384, 387, 388, 400, 405, 419, 432, 445, 446, 457, 459, 465, 469, 475, 525, 543, 576, 578, 579, 596,

and authorize the editor to implement those changes in the next issue of the SDD

Kind regards,
Shkumbin Hamiti
SDD Editor