| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Roger: Was this #3 circulation producing comments
or resolutions? Will the Vancouver meeting produce Rev2/D10? Peretz Feder From: Roger B. Marks
[mailto:r.b.marks@ieee.org] To: 802 EC reflector The conditions have been
met. Sponsor Ballot Recirculation #3, including the review of
P802.16Rev2/D9, ran from 30 January - 14 February. All Disapprove voters
at the start of the recirc converted to Approve during the recirc. During the recirc, one new Disapprove vote was received, with one
associated comment submittal. However, I have ruled the comment invalid. Per
Clause 19, I am reporting the details. Page: [none] Line: [none] Subclause: [none] Comment: This standard needs
major revisions as it does not represent the needs of the marketplace. Proposed Change: needs
modifications to support much lower average data rates, improvement over 802.11
systems, and better economics Resolution Status: Out of Scope Resolution Detail: The 802.16
Working Group Chair and the 802.16 Maintenance Task Group Chair, acting with
the authorization of the 802.16 Working Group, have ruled this comment Out of
Scope of the recirculation since it does not meet the requirements of Subclause
5.4.3.2 of the IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual, which states
that comments associated with a 'do not approve' vote "shall be
based only on the changed portions of the balloted document, portions of the
balloted document affected by the changes, or portions of the balloted document
that are the subject of unresolved comments associated with negative
votes." Furthermore, the comment fails to fulfill the requirement stated
in Subclause 5.4.3.1 of the IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual
that a Disapprove vote "must be accompanied by one or more specific objections
with proposed resolution in sufficient detail in a legible form so that the
specific wording of the changes that will cause the negative voter to change
his or her vote to 'approve' can readily be determined." No other
comments, valid or invalid, are associated with Disapprove
votes. The final approval ratio, as reported by MyBallot, was 165 Approve,
1 Disapprove. Since the conditions have
been met, I am proceeding with submittal for the RevCom meeting of 18 March.
|