[STDS-802-16] [TGm] Editorial comments in AWD Comment Database
Dear all,
I plan to issue a motion to approve the following comments from IEEE
802.16m-09/0014r1 that are marked as editorial:
001, 010, 040, 042, 051, 052, 064, 066, 067, 069, 070, 072, 080, 081,
082, 094, 098, 099, 100, 104, 107, 108, 116, 117, 119, 128, 163, 173,
174, 179, 182, 193, 194, 195.
Please let me know if you think that there are comments in the list
that do not belong to the editorial category.
The following comments were marked as "Editorial" but are not included
in my motion for the reasons listed:
#006 may be superceded by technical comments 2 or 4
#008 has rejections in the reply comments
#009 has rejections in the reply comments
#013 is not editorial; needs to be agreed
#036 is not editorial and does not contain a remedy
#040 remedy was corrected
#043 is a "shall" change, looks okay, but that's a loaded word
#057 does not contain clear remedy - review
#066 remedy was modified
#068 is rejected by a member
#071 does not provide a useful remedy
#074 remedy just makes the text more unclear. Agree on a proper fix
#075 - editor disagrees. We intentionally reserved the clause
#089 has a rejection
#111 is technical and has rejections
#176 contains a rejection
Kind regards,
Ron Murias
TGm AWD Editor