[STDS-802-16]

[Kenneth Stanwood <kstanwood@KLSWIRELESS.COM>]

I completely agree with Brian.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kiernan, Brian G <Brian.Kiernan@INTERDIGITAL.COM>
Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2009 9:55 AM
To: STDS-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG <STDS-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Subject: [STDS-802-16]


Local Routing has no real advantage unless the bulk of the traffic is
local.  Before you start trying to solve the technical issues, I suggest
you determine if it really is worth solving.  Most of the cellular
carriers have found out over the years that local routing is a solution
looking for a problem, as relatively little mobile traffic is local
(e.g, within the same coverage area).

-----Original Message-----
From: Nadeem Akhtar [mailto:nadeem@CEWIT.ORG.IN]
Sent: Saturday, September 12, 2009 6:40 AM
To: STDS-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [STDS-802-16]

Dear Peretz, all,

In addition to the issues you have mentioned, there's also the need for
lawful interception which is difficult to meet when Local Routing is
applied.

Regards,
Nadeem

>
> dear Sydir, Rakesh, and all,
> I'm just wondering why don't we consider LR (Local Routing). I'm aware
> of a few drawbacks such as accounting/billing issues, etc', but still
LR
> has a lot of advantages such as decreasing of backhauling load,
> decreasing of delay, .... .
>
>
> Thanks,
> peretz Shekalim
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: Sydir, Jerry [mailto:jerry.sydir@INTEL.COM]
> Sent: Saturday, September 12, 2009 3:49 AM
> To: STDS-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> Subject: [STDS-802-16]
>
>
>
> Dear Relay DG participants,
>
>
>
> We have uploaded the minutes from the second Relay DG conference call
to
> the temp directory. Here is a link for your convenience.
>
>
http://dot16.org/ul//upload/temp_db/RelayDG%2dMinutes%2d2ndCC%2d10SeptPS
> T.txt
>
<http://dot16.org/ul/upload/temp_db/RelayDG%2dMinutes%2d2ndCC%2d10SeptPS
> T.txt>
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Jerry Sydir and Rakesh Taori
>
> Relay DG Chairs
>
>
>
>
>
>


--