Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-16] Editorial Motion

Hi,

The following comments should be discussed in this weeks session (should not be included to the Editorial Motion). There are a variety of reasons: comment is technical, comment may be editorial but editorial instructions are insufficient, conflicting cross-reference resolutions, etc:

6, 104, 155, 226, 261, 263, 269, 281, 285, 289, 299, 300, 305, 410, 416, 439, 487, 488, 532, 556, 604, 668, 836, 864, 878, 881, 923, 933, 939, 940, 941, 942, 943, 978, 1006, 1021, 1038, 1121, 1138, 1144, 1150, 1154

Thanks,
Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: ext Ron Murias [mailto:ron@MURIAS.CA] 
Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 2:01 PM
To: STDS-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [STDS-802-16] Editorial Motion

All,

I have uploaded (to the Temp directory) a list of comments that I intend to include in my Editorial Motion at the end of the week.  Please review this list and let me know if any of these comments should be treated as Technical comments.

Regards,
Ron Murias
Editor