Dear 802.16 M2M Fans,
After the CC#4, where we had a PAR scope discussion, we kind of reached the following general view on how to address the M2M PAR Scope.
- Option 1: Explicitly 16m & 16e
- Option 2: Explicitly 16m only
- Option 3: Implicitly allow PAR flexibility to decide later: (Default 16m only, but flexibility for 16e if required) – Preferred
- MAC changes for M2M features
- Option1 : MAC changes
- Option 2: MAC changes limited to those enabling M2M requirements – Preferred
- Option 3: Limited MAC changes
- PHY Changes for M2M features
- Option1 : PHY changes
- Option 2: PHY changes limited to those enabling M2M requirements. (Add to the additional explanatory notes section – preferably no hardware changes) – Preferred
- Option 3: Limited PHY changes
- Option 4: No PHY changes
I would not want to suggest that this provides us precise language, because it does not. But the intent is to have PAR language agreed to in the next call CC#5 with this as a framework to start drafting it.
The next call is on April 28th and the Agenda will be: PAR Form Updated Draft for May Session & Study Report Final Draft.
CC#5 Bridge is again provided below:
Thanks & best regards,
jose