Re: [STDS-802-16] [802SEC] Proposed P802.16p PAR
Pat,
Thank you for your comments. The 802.16 WG will consider them and respond when it meets in San Diego.
Roger
On 2010/06/12, at 02:56 AM, Pat Thaler wrote:
> Regarding the 5 Criteria - Distinct Identity a): It isn't entirely accurate. The motivation for 802.3af Power over Ethernet standard was largely an enhancement to meet the needs of devices such as cameras, sensors and controllers so that they didn't require a separate power connection so there was a prior standard with the objective of providing for such devices. I'm not saying that your proposed work doesn't have distinct identity - just that the distinctness isn't as broad as your current statement. 802.3 already addresses large numbers of devices and very low power operation. Perhaps you can make your statement more accurate by qualifying it as applying to subscriber or wireless networks.
>
> Regards,
> Pat
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List ***** [mailto:STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Roger B. Marks
> Sent: Friday, June 11, 2010 2:30 AM
> To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> Subject: [802SEC] Proposed P802.16p PAR
>
> Dear EC Colleagues,
>
> The 802.16 Working Group is submitting a draft PAR and Five Criteria for consideration at the July IEEE 802 Plenary.
>
> The documentation, for an amendment project on "Enhancements to provide functionalities specific to Machine to Machine Communication", is available here:
> <http://ieee802.org/16/ppc/docs/80216ppc-10_0003r6.doc>
>
> This was agreed by the Working Group at its Session #67 in May.
>
> Roger
>
>
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
>
>