| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
The initial circulation ballot
of the IEEE 802.16m Sponsor Ballot has closed. See the below email from Roger
Marks with details on the ballot results. This note is a Call for
Reply Comments, with a deadline of Monday 12 July 2010 at 9:00 AM The Commentary file will
open to the view in which you can begin entering reply comments. Use the
"Submit Reply Comments" tab in the upper right corner to export your
replies to a file for uploading, per the embedded instructions. Reply comments,
in "cmtr" format, need to be uploaded to the “sb_16m”
upload directory <http://dot16.org/ul/ul.cgi?command=viewupload&database=sb_16m_db>.
The Ballot ID tag "sb_16m" is embedded in the Commentary database. Sorry for the late notice on
the Call for Reply Comments, but I have been in transit since prior to the
posting of the commentary database (just) and have only become available to
post the Call for Reply Comments. Thanks, IEEE 802.16 TGM Vice Chair From: Roger B. Marks
[mailto:r.b.marks@ieee.org] P802.16m/D6 was reviewed in IEEE-SA Sponsor Ballot, from 9 June - 9
July. The results are: 152 Approve The return ratio (81%) is sufficient. The approval ratio (58%) is
not. 1004 comments were submitted. Ron Murias and I have compiled the
database: <http://ieee802.org/16/docs/#10_0040>. Comments numbered 1 through 665 were submitted to the IEEE's myBallot
system. Comments numbered 10001 through 10339 were submitted directly to
the WG. There is some duplication, because some people submitted comments to
both places. This is not simple to track. Note that myBallot does not represent
text formatting, so some content may have been lost in translation.
|