Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Dear Jaesun and all:
Thank you for Jaesun's initializing discussion on network reentry.
I am Lei from Samsung.
I have the similar view on network reentry trigger with Jaesun. There are two trigger modes for network reentry inculding network and terminals (MS and Group).For network reentry triggered M2M group,we need uniform some attributes including Group ID,member ID, group delagate and group member of M2M group.
Btw,16m S-SFH SP3 has carriered ranging information. Any comments are welcome.
BR
Lei
------- Original Message -------
Sender : 차재선<jscha@etri.re.kr>
Date : 二月 14, 2011 19:15 (GMT+09:00)
Title : [STDS-802-16] [16p PWR RG - NE #1] Discussion on access control during network reentry from idle mode
Dear 16p members,
Thanks to all of you for joining the first PWR RG conference call and sharing much valuable opinions.
I’ve uploaded the meeting summary capturing Q&A discussion during the call (80216p-rg-11_0034.doc) to the upload server.
Here are some key issues and action items of today's call:
1. Idle Mode Operation
[IDLE#1] New Group Paging Concept (Including hierarchical paging): Need to clarify its gain?
[IDLE#2] Modified & Additional LU mechanism (Cell-/Timer-based): Is new definition necessary?
[IDLE#3] Longer Paging Cycle
Hyunjeong, Soojung, and Giwon presented their contribution. I would like to ask someone among you volunteering to lead the harmonization on each topic.
2. Network Reentry from Idle Mode
[NE#1] Definition of Waiting Time before UL ranging for network re-entry
a. Waiting time after receiving paging: Need to clarify its gain?
b. Different ranging opportunities for M2M group with priority: Increased congestions to low priority group?
[NE#2] Dedicated ranging code and/or ranging region for M2M (e.g., S-RNG): Impact to legacy MS and its overhead of dedicated region?
Jin, Chiwoo, Ping-Heng, Andreas, Yu-Chuan, Wei-Chieh presented their contribution. I would like to ask someone among you volunteering to lead the harmonization on each topic.
3. Device collaboration
[DC#1] on-/off-state frame control for DC support: Need to clarify the power saving gain from device collaboration?
Jinsoo presented the contribution. Jinsoo, could you initiate harmonization activities with other members?
If there is any other issue, please let us know.
* Notes:
1. For all members who are interested in the above 6 issues, please share your opinion.
2. The initiation of the e-mail discussion, please use the HEADER (e.g., [IDLE#1], [NE#2]...) in the e-mail title.
Regards,
Kiseon Ryu
PWR RG Chair