Folks,
Please note the comment below from EC Vice Chair Pat Thaler regarding the draft 802.16 PARs. She says:
"I think they should have a small difference in scope that indicates what part of the work is being done in that amendment".
We need to include a response to this (due Wed 5 pm).
Roger
Begin forwarded message: Date: 2 November 2011 6:44:15 PM EDT
Subject: Re: [802SEC] PARs
Pat, Yes, this is right. Two existing amendment PARs are being split because the base standard was split. This was noted in the announcement: < http://ieee802.org/secmail/msg14123.html> I'll bring your comment to the 802.16 WG for review. Thanks, Roger Roger B. Marks < roger@consensii.com> Consensii LLC < http://consensii.com> Chair, IEEE 802.16 Working Group on Broadband Wireless Access < http://WirelessMAN.org> On 2011/11/02, at 12:08 PM, Pat Thaler wrote: If I recall correctly, those were for work that needed to amend both 802.16.1 and 802.16 so one standards effort needed two amendment PARs. However, I think they should have a small difference in scope that indicates what part of the work is being done in that amendment. E.g. when we needed an amendment to 802.1Q and 802.3 to do PFC, the scope for the 802.3 amendment specified that it was to add the MAC control frame for PFC.
Pat
-----Original Message-----
From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List ***** [mailto:STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org] On Behalf Of James P. K. Gilb
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2011 10:05 AM
To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [802SEC] PARs
All
Sorry about that, I finally got around to updating the page.
However, I am confused about Roger's PARs, perhaps he can explain them.
802.16.1b and 802.16p seem to cover the same scope. Likewise,802.16.1a
and 802.16n are also the same scope.
I assume that what is really happening is that one PAR is replacing the
other, but then that doesn't make sense really either.
James Gilb
On 11/01/2011 07:42 AM, Tony Jeffree wrote:
I notice that the PARs page shows no PARs under consideration for
November, but I'm sure I have seen one or two whizz by on the exploder.
Does anyone have a definitive list?
Regards,
Tony
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
Subscriptions: http://wirelessman.org/reflector.html
|