|
Sounds great. The definition sounds more clear too.
The only minor tweak that I would suggest is to
replace the word node with flows or conversations in the end of the definition
which would make it:
Bottleneck-link fairness: Fairness
based on a mechanism that controls the throughput of each node
according to a fair proportion of that link between source and destination
that is shared by the highest number of nodes.
Khaled Amer President, AmerNet Inc. Architecture Analysis and
Performance Modeling Specialists Address: 13711
Solitaire Way, Irvine, CA
92620 Phone:
(949)552-1114
Fax:
(949)552-1116
e-mail: khaledamer@xxxxxxx
Web: www.performancemodeling.com
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 12:01
PM
Subject: Re: [RPRWG] Definition of terms
- First set
Dear Khaled
Thank you for your comments. I will try to quantify maximum delay bounds
for different kind of services.
Next try.
I will change the original definition
Bottleneck-link fairness:
Fairness based on a mechanism that coordinates the ring access
of only those nodes that use the same links for their packet
transfers.
by
Bottleneck-link fairness:
Fairness based on a mechanism that controls the throughput
of each node according to a fair proportion of that link between
source and destination that is shared by the highest number of
nodes.
Best regards, Harmen
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 7:02
PM
Subject: Re: [RPRWG] Definition of
terms - First set
Harmen,
This is an excellent piece of work.
I have a couple of questions:
- Do we want to quantify delay jitter instead of
just mentioning variation in delay? I know it's a sore point in the
literature, but maybe we can come up with something.
- Not sure I understand your definition for
Bottleneck-link
fairness
Thanks.
Khaled Amer President, AmerNet Inc. Architecture Analysis and
Performance Modeling Specialists Address: 13711
Solitaire Way, Irvine, CA
92620 Phone:
(949)552-1114
Fax:
(949)552-1116
e-mail: khaledamer@xxxxxxx
Web: www.performancemodeling.com
|