Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Re: [RPRWG] Fw: RPR Perf: Thoughts on TCP parameters

To: Khaled Amer <amer@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Reflector RPRWG <stds-802-17@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RPRWG] Fw: RPR Perf: Thoughts on TCP parameters
From: "Kastenholz, Frank" <FKastenholz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2001 07:44:14 -0400
In-Reply-To: <012401c102b7$4d4dce60$6401a8c0@HOME>
References: <5.0.2.1.2.20010629083235.02613ec0@uniwest1>
Sender: owner-stds-802-17@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


At 10:24 PM 7/1/01 -0700, Khaled Amer wrote:
>Thanks, Frank, for the input.
>
>> UDP should not be an issue here.
>One thought comes to my mind here. I guess we will need to at least define a
>good unified mix of UDP and TCP traffic so we have well defined scenarios
>and a consistent framework for running the simulations.
>
>Any comments?

see the real-world packet header traces that
are available at

http://moat.nlanr.net/Traces/

Frank Kastenholz

References:
- Re: [RPRWG] Fw: RPR Perf: Thoughts on TCP parameters
  - From: Kastenholz, Frank
- Re: [RPRWG] Fw: RPR Perf: Thoughts on TCP parameters
  - From: Khaled Amer

Prev by Date: RE: [RPRWG] Fw: RPR Perf: Thoughts on TCP parameters
Next by Date: RE: [RPRWG] Fw: RPR Perf: Thoughts on TCP parameters
Prev by thread: Re: [RPRWG] Fw: RPR Perf: Thoughts on TCP parameters
Next by thread: Re: [RPRWG] Fw: RPR Perf: Thoughts on TCP parameters
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread