Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
An outstanding job was done on the comment
resolution process by Bob, Bob, and the Comment Resolution group. Thank
you for your dedication and hard work. I have a number of minor comments
on the proposed resolutions. Each of my comments references the
ballot comment number assigned by the data base.
Comment #
#11 - I propose changing the resolution to “allows stations to communicate” #12 I propose you delete the word “time” from the proposed rewording so it becomes “The difference between…” #20 – Class of Service can refer to more than delivery priority. I agree with Leon’s comment and disagree with your apparent decision to not change the definition. #21 – Your Proposed Accept does not state how you intend to
change the definition since two choices were presented. I recommend leaving the definition and
changing the term defined to the singular (one of the two choices
proposed). #22 – Please add to the proposed resolution “use the singular consistently throughout the definitions unless there is a compelling reason to use the plural form.” Adding that statement will clarify the reason for further changes not necessarily indicated in the comment resolutions so far. #37 and #39– Please state which proposed resolution you intend to apply to each of these comments. #43 – please clarify. You state “replace transmission …” but the word transmission does not appear in the definition. Please clarify what your proposed replacement text is. #48 – My vote is to leave it “media”, not “medium” (in response to the question at the end of your proposed resolution). #71 – Once you have deleted the word “successfully” then there is no need for the last sentence of the definition, which should now also be deleted. #144 – You indicate that you will use the term “Service Class” but its definition is not contained in the Terms and Definitions. Please state what that definition is. #162 – The proposed resolution was accept. However, you have not supplied the clause for “source stripping”. Please do so. #166 – Please state explicitly what changes you will make to the T&Ds based on this comment resolution. I can’t tell. #170 – I think Mike Takefman’s words are good ones and should be appended to the definition. #194 – after making the change indicate the reference definition has been modified. #203 – Also change the term defined to the singular, and drop “is” from “…is received”. #229 – I request you avoid use of the acronym SDU and spell out the term. #231 – This comment was rejected because no remedy was specified. Not so: “Delete the phrase” was offered as one remedy. If you don’t like that remedy, state why not. I offer “A loose definition of LAN is intended here. The present definition accomplishes that purpose.” #238 – change “single staion or medium failure” to “media or single station failure.” The sentence should make clear that more than a single fiber strand could be cut. For example, there could be a cable cut, severing both ringlets. #241 – Please explain why 802.3 was added to this definition. #1001 – Please clarify what specific change you are proposing. Best Regards,
Robert D. Love
Chair, Resilient Packet Ring Alliance President, LAN Connect Consultants Phone: 919 848-6773, email: rdlove@xxxxxxxx, Mobile: 919
810-7816
|