RE: [RPRWG] New Performance Committee Guidelines available

[Anoop Ghanwani <anoop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Title: New Performance Committee Guidelines available

Khaled,

 

I just went through the document and liked the thorough

documentation of the various metrics that one needs to

consider.  I would, however, have liked to see some fixed

set of topologies/flows on which to run simulations.  For

example, having something like a ring with 6 or 8 nodes,

specifying the speed/length of the segments, and

specifying the traffic flows between each of the nodes

(both endpoints and characteristics).  The expected results

in terms of throughput, etc. should also be specified.

In some sense, it involves taking what we think are the

requirements and building a network topology on which

to test it.

 

Would you consider something like this to be within the

charter of the Performance Committee?

 

-Anoop

 

-----Original Message-----
From: John Hawkins [mailto:jhawkins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:01 PM
To: 'stds-802-17@xxxxxxxx'
Cc: 'Khaled Amer'
Subject: RE: [RPRWG] New Performance Committee Guidelines available

The link below is wrong, please try:

http://www.ieee802.org/17/documents/perfcom/Performance_Committee_Guidelines1_0.pdf

 

Sorry for the inconvenience,

 

john

-----Original Message-----
From: Hawkins, John [WWP1:2268:EXCH]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 2:57 PM
To: 'stds-802-17@xxxxxxxx'
Cc: 'Khaled Amer'
Subject: [RPRWG] New Performance Committee Guidelines available

At Khaled's request, I have placed a file on the Performance Committee page entitled Performance_Committee_Guidelines1_0.pdf.  If you are involved in performance simulations, it may be of interest to you.

You may access it directly by clicking the following link:
http://www.iee802.org/17/perfcom/Performance_Committee_Guidelines1_0.pdf

Please forward your comments/questions directly to Khaled. (amer@xxxxxxxxxxx)

Happy simulating...

john