Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

RE: [RPRWG] RE: [IPORPR] payload length and padding and stuff

To: "Nader Vijeh" <nader@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Necdet Uzun" <nuzun@xxxxxxxxx>, "Anoop Ghanwani" <anoop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [RPRWG] RE: [IPORPR] payload length and padding and stuff
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 10:44:46 +0200
Cc: "Frank Kastenholz" <fkastenholz@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <iporpr@xxxxxxxx>, <stds-802-17@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-stds-802-17@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-Index: AcKbSRal+jitXgfVT8KxwJcUkp4MEwAJ+XZA
Thread-Topic: [RPRWG] RE: [IPORPR] payload length and padding and stuff


> 
> The max frame size may be extended beyond 802.3 1522 bytes 
> limit as there is
> precedence in 802.3 community.

Nader,

I am not sure what you exactly mean. If you refer to what is popularly known as 'Jumbo frames', they are not supported by the IEEE 802.3 standards. 

Dan

Prev by Date: RE: [RPRWG] RE: [IPORPR] payload length and padding and stuff
Next by Date: RE: [RPRWG] Ethertypes for circuit emulation
Prev by thread: RE: [RPRWG] RE: [IPORPR] payload length and padding and stuff
Next by thread: RE: [RPRWG] RE: [IPORPR] payload length and padding and stuff
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread