Re: [RPRWG] Simulation results

["Jon Schuringa" <jon.schuringa@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

 

 

 

Yes, it is better to change only one parameter at a time. New results with fixed 500km ring are here:

http://www.ikn.tuwien.ac.at/~nthuma/simRes2.pdf  

 

Jon

 

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Necdet Uzun

To: Jon Schuringa

Cc: stds-802-17@xxxxxxxx

Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 12:10 AM

Subject: Re: [RPRWG] Simulation results

Jon,

Thank you for running these simulations. These are very valuable. The only think that is not clear to me from the result is whether the buffer requirement is linearly increased with number of nodes or with the size of the ring. Can you please run the same simulations for a fixed size ring say for 500km with varying number of nodes as in your graphs? After that we can determine whether the number of nodes affect the buffer requirements or not and based on that we can modify the formulas if necessary.

Thanks.

Necdet

Jon Schuringa wrote:

Dear all, I finished the simulations about the maximum stq buffer occupancy withfixed values for stqLowThreshold and stqHighThreshold andstqFullThreshold set to infinity, as Necdet proposed. You can get the results here:http://www.ikn.tuwien.ac.at/~nthuma/simRes.pdf  - Jon