|
Tom,
It
would have been nice if the requirements could have been more
related
to the
quality of the document, such as:
1) Reviewers have actually read the document
(the 0 comments
indicates most have not)
2) The document is actually understandable &
unambiguous
(the 100's of comments
indicates otherwise)
While
sending it to Sponsor may be legal and seem like a neat idea
(from
a marketing perspective), the unresolved issues and
ambiguous text will be even more painful and time
consuming
to fix
through the Sponsor ballot review process.
DVJ
David V. James
3180 South Ct
Palo Alto, CA 94306
Home:
+1.650.494.0926
+1.650.856.9801
Cell:
+1.650.954.6906
Fax: +1.360.242.5508
Base: dvj@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Bob,
The draft will be forwarded to Sponsor Ballot
only after (a) the WG has voted to
do so, (b) it has met the 802 requirements as
outlined in the LMSC rules, and
(c) the SEC approves the Sponsor Ballot
request.
Best regards,
- Tom Alexander
Chief Editor, P802.17
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 6:20
PM
Subject: RE: [RPRWG] D2.4 Ballot
Status
When does this go to sponsor
ballot?
Bob Doverspike
Colleagues,
Enclosed please find the ballot status for
D2.4. Note that the
ballot has passed with an 81.8% approval
ratio.
I would like all of the voters to check their
comment and
ballot status. Note in particular that some
of the voters have
agreed with the resolution of all of their
Technically Binding
comments against D2.3, and their votes have been changed
to Approve. If any voter feels that this was
done in error,
please contact me immediately.
Best regards,
- Tom Alexander
Chief Editor, P802.17
|