| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Mike,
I'm surprised to see that comment period closes on Wednesday
morning of the plenary and
not prior to the
plenary. That does not allow any time during the meeting for comment
resolution.
thanks,
robert
> -----Original Message-----
>
From: Mike Takefman [mailto:tak@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 11:41 AM
> To: stds-802-17
> Subject: [RPRWG]
Opening of Recirculation Ballot on Draft 2.7
> of
P802.17
>
>
> Announcement of opening of 802.17 WG Recirculation
Ballot and
> Comment Period
>
--------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------
>
> Dear IEEE 802.17 Working Group Member:
>
> This e-mail is to advise you of the opening of the
IEEE 802.17
> Working Group Recirculation Ballot for
IEEE P802.17 (Resilient
> Packet Ring), Draft 2.7,
otherwise known as:
>
>
Information Technology - Telecommunications and information
> exchange between systems - Local & Metropolitan Area Networks
-
> Specific requirements - Resilient Packet Ring
Access Method and
> Physical Layer
Specifications
>
> The
comment period opens on Tuesday, 28 October 2003 at 9.00
> AM PDT and
> closes on Wednesday, 12
November 2003 at 10:00 AM PDT.
>
> THIS IS AN 802.17 BALLOT. All valid ballots (votes on the
document)
> that are submitted along with comments
will be counted
> towards approval
> or disapproval of the draft. A valid ballot is one that is cast by
a
> voting member of the 802.17 group that also voted
(approve, disapprove
> or abstain) during the D2.3
ballot.
>
> All properly
submitted comments will be resolved during the November
> 2003 Plenary meeting in Albuquerque. Note that you are only
> required to
> submit a
ballot if you wish to change your existing vote. If
>
you do not
> submit a ballot, your last recorded vote
will be carried
> forward unchanged.
>
> Further, if you had voted Disapprove on
D2.3, D2.4, D2.5 or D2.6
> along with applicable
Technically Binding comments, and all of
> these
comments have been resolved to your satisfaction, then you
> are requested to submit new Technically Binding comments if you
wish
> to maintain your vote as Disapprove. If you
wish to change your
> vote from Disapprove to Approve
in spite of any outstanding
> Technically Binding
comments, please submit a new ballot as well.
>
> A copy of this draft can be found on our
password-protected website:
>
> http://www.ieee802.org/17/member/draftballots/d2_7/
>
> The draft is posted in Adobe
"pdf" document format and can be
> viewed online, or
downloaded and printed. You will need a copy of
>
Adobe's Acrobat Reader (4.0 or higher) to view or print the
> draft. This
> software is available for
free downloading from Adobe at:
>
http://www.adobe.com/prodindex/acrobat/readstep.html.
>
> The draft prints out as 754
paper pages. It is copyrighted by the IEEE
> and is
for your review and balloting purposes only. It should not be
> copied or otherwise distributed.
>
> As this is a RECIRCULATION BALLOT, only changed
sections of the draft
> (i.e., those with changebars
along the left hand side) are
> now open for
> comments. Please refrain from commenting against draft
text that does
> not have a changebar next to
it.
>
> The ballot/comment
executable with instructions is available at:
>
> http://www.ieee802.org/17/member/draftballots/d2_7/P802_17D2_7
> _CRD_Win.zip
> or
> http://www.ieee802.org/17/member/draftballots/d2_7/P802_17D2_7
> _CRD_Mac.sit
>
> The comment executable is designed for systems capable of
running
> Windows or Macintosh based programs. Please
read the comment
> instructions carefully.
>
> The set of Technically
Binding comments that were rejected at the
> October
2003 Interim meeting is supplied in the file:
> http://www.ieee802.org/17/member/draftballots/d2_7/rejectedCom
mentaryData.USR
>
> You may review the rejected comments by simply double-clicking on
the
> above file (after first downloading the
ballot/comment
> executable). You
> may, if you wish, change your vote from Approve to Disapprove,
or
> maintain your Disapprove vote, on the basis that
one or more of these
> Technically Binding comments
should not have been rejected. In this
> case, please
submit a new ballot with accompanying Technically Binding
> comments indicating the reason for your Disapprove vote.
>
> Please submit ballots and
comments (using the output of your comment
>
executable) electronically to Tom Alexander at:
>
tom@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> If you should have any questions, problems or
comments please contact:
>
Mike Takefman
>
Chair, IEEE 802.17 Working Group
> Office: 613-254-3399 Fax:
613-254-3778
>
tak@xxxxxxxxx
>
>
Tom Alexander
>
Chief Editor, IEEE 802.17 Working Group
> Cell: 503-803-3534 Fax:
503-632-7621
>
tom@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> NOTE:
>
> According to the RPR Working Group ballot process, official
> ballots will
> only be
accepted from voting members of the 802.17 Working Group. The
> draft is also, however, being circulated to those who have
been
> participating in the standardization process
but are not
> members of the
> Working Group, in order to provide a wide review of the
> document and to
>
solicit comments.
>
> You
should also be aware that Technical-Binding (TB) comments are not
> required to be tracked amongst non-Working Group members.
If a TB is
> entered by a person who is not a Working
Group member, and this person
> is not at attendance
and readily available at the interim meeting to
>
review the Working Group's response, we will not obligate the
> editors or
> staff of 802.17 to track
down the commenter and obtain the sign-off.
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Mike Takefman
>
> --
> Michael
Takefman
tak@xxxxxxxxx
> Distinguished
Engineer, Cisco Systems
> Chair IEEE 802.17 Stds WG
> 3000
Innovation Dr, Ottawa, Canada, K2K 3E8
> voice:
613-254-3399 cell:613-220-6991
>