Re: [RPRWG] P802.17 Interim Session (Oct 4-6)

[Marc Holness <holness@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Title: Message

 

Could be a new clause or annex. Depending upon technical direction of specification could also be sub-clause. At this point in time, not sure what the best 802.17 specification vehicle should be.

 

Perhaps we can discuss.

 

Marc.

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Leon Bruckman [mailto:leonb@CORRIGENT.COM]
Sent: Sunday, September 05, 2004 6:07 AM
To: STDS-802-17@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [RPRWG] P802.17 Interim Session (Oct 4-6)

Marc,

What was the reason the decide to add a sub-clause instead of an Annex ?

 

Leon

 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-17@listserv.ieee.org [mailto:owner-stds-802-17@listserv.ieee.org] On Behalf Of Marc Holness
Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004 3:40 AM
To: STDS-802-17@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: [RPRWG] P802.17 Interim Session (Oct 4-6)

 

 

RPRWGers,

As previously stated by Mike Takefman, the focus of this session will be the Spatially Aware Bridging Study Group (SABSG).

To facilitate the finalization of the PAR and 5-Criteria for the project, please find attached 3 packages outlining:

        1) Aspects of a proposed PAR,
        2) Draft 5-Criteria,
        3) Operating objectives governing the project,

that we will review during the session.

Regards,

Marc Holness