Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [RPRWG] P802.17 Interim Session (Oct 4-6)



Definitely agree that it is an optional layer, but if you
choose to implement it - there will be PICS to comply
to.

I might ask the following question. Where was this
going to be in the base standard before we decided
to delay the work. Arguably, it is those clauses that
we should be ammending.

mike

Michael Allen wrote:
> While this will be an OPTIONAL feature to fully support, I am guessing
> that if you implement it there will be PICS entries for conformance that
> will be MANDATORY for the feature. If there are PICS, it would seem like
> you would have to have a sub-clause.
>
> Michael
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>     *From:* Marc Holness [mailto:holness@NORTELNETWORKS.COM]
>     *Sent:* Sunday, September 05, 2004 5:00 PM
>     *To:* STDS-802-17@listserv.ieee.org
>     *Subject:* Re: [RPRWG] P802.17 Interim Session (Oct 4-6)
>
>
>     Could be a new clause or annex. Depending upon technical direction
>     of specification could also be sub-clause. At this point in time,
>     not sure what the best 802.17 specification vehicle should be.
>
>     Perhaps we can discuss.
>
>     Marc.
>
>
>
>         -----Original Message-----
>         *From:* Leon Bruckman [mailto:leonb@CORRIGENT.COM]
>         *Sent:* Sunday, September 05, 2004 6:07 AM
>         *To:* STDS-802-17@listserv.ieee.org
>         *Subject:* Re: [RPRWG] P802.17 Interim Session (Oct 4-6)
>
>         Marc,
>
>         What was the reason the decide to add a sub-clause instead of an
>         Annex ?
>
>
>
>         Leon
>
>
>
>         -----Original Message-----
>         *From:* owner-stds-802-17@listserv.ieee.org
>         [mailto:owner-stds-802-17@listserv.ieee.org] *On Behalf Of *Marc
>         Holness
>         *Sent:* Friday, September 03, 2004 3:40 AM
>         *To:* STDS-802-17@listserv.ieee.org
>         *Subject:* [RPRWG] P802.17 Interim Session (Oct 4-6)
>
>
>
>
>
>         RPRWGers,
>
>         As previously stated by Mike Takefman, the focus of this session
>         will be the Spatially Aware Bridging Study Group (SABSG).
>
>         To facilitate the finalization of the PAR and 5-Criteria for the
>         project, please find attached 3 packages outlining:
>
>                 1) Aspects of a proposed PAR,
>                 2) Draft 5-Criteria,
>                 3) Operating objectives governing the project,
>
>         that we will review during the session.
>
>         Regards,
>
>         Marc Holness
>
>
>


--
Michael Takefman              tak@cisco.com
Distinguished Engineer,       Cisco Systems
Chair IEEE 802.17 Stds WG
3000 Innovation Dr, Ottawa, Canada, K2K 3E8
voice: 613-254-3399       cell:613-220-6991