Roger,
Thanks. I will schedule it
for Tuesday PM2.
Steve
From:
r.b.marks@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:r.b.marks@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Roger Marks
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008
12:55 PM
To: Shellhammer, Steve
Cc: stds-802-19-colocate@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: background on
co-located coexistence
Steve,
Some of the interested participants in 802.16 are putting together a
presentation. I think it would be helpful to allocate some discussion time.
Regards,
Roger
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 1:38 AM, Shellhammer, Steve <sshellha@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
There has not been too much traffic on this email reflector.
I wanted to know if anyone plans to prepare any material on
this topic (co-located coexistence) for the Denver meeting. I can
allocate time for this topic if there is interest and someone wants to present
something.
Regards,
Steve
I support
the allocation of one 802.19 meeting interval.
I hope
we'll have some useful exchange beforehand so that meeting won't start cold.
On Jun 2,
2008, at 12:16 PM, John Barr wrote:
Good idea. I am sure there is
sufficient information to cover in one session. John
On 6/2/08 12:01 PM, "Shellhammer, Steve" <sshellha@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I have one question for the group.
Should we have a meeting on this topic at the July plenary? The 802.19
TAG could host the meeting if there is interest.
Steve
From: stds-802-19-colocate@xxxxxxxx
[mailto:stds-802-19-colocate@xxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Roger B. Marks
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2008 10:54
PM
To: stds-802-19-colocate@xxxxxxxx
Subject: background on co-located
coexistence
I want to thank Steve for setting up this reflector.
To start things rolling, I just wanted to first remind the folks
here of some background.
(1) An IEEE 802 Tutorial of 13 November 2007 on
"WPAN/WLAN/WWAN Multi-Radio Coexistence" was primarily on coexistence
among co-located radios:
<http://ieee802.org/802_tutorials/nov07/IEEE-multi-radio-coex-tutorial.ppt>.
(2) At the March 802 Plenary, the 802.16 Working Group wrote to
the 802.11 and 802.15 Working Groups:
<http://ieee802.org/16/liaison/docs/L80216-08_019.pdf>.
That letter noted that 802.16 has been developing solutions
relevant to this problem for incorporation into the P802.16Rev2 draft. It added
that it was aware of related work in the 802.11 Working Group, particularly in
the 802.11v Network Management Task Group. The 802.16 WG said that it it would
"like to see the various techniques considered for compatibility to ensure
that they work effectively together." It requested some followup
discussions by WG participants.
(3) The 802.11 and 802.15 WGs responded in May:
<http://ieee802.org/16/liaison/docs/L80216-08_036.pdf>.
indicating support for the discussions.
802.16 has continued with the development in this area,
particularly by moving ahead with a specification of "Sleep mode
supporting co-located coexistence" in the P802.16Rev2 draft.
I hope that, through this reflector, the participants will have a
chance to exchange views on the progress in the various groups. I would
"like to see the various techniques considered for compatibility to ensure
that they work effectively together."
Regards,
Roger
Roger B. Marks <r.b.marks@xxxxxxxx>
Chair, IEEE 802.16 Working Group on Broadband Wireless
Access <http://WirelessMAN.org>
--
John R. Barr (John.Barr@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Director, Standards Realization - <http://www.motorola.com>
Vice Chairman of the Board, Bluetooth SIG - <http://www.bluetooth.org>
(847) 576-8706 (office) +1-847-962-5407 (mobile) (847) 576-6758 (FAX)
|