| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
IEEE 802.19 TAG Members,
Here are some documents on the new study group on contention
based protocols. Given that systems in these bands are intended to
contend with one another for channel access there may be some
interesting coexistence questions that arise from this work. So you may
find it of interest.
Regards,
Steve
_________________
Steve Shellhammer
Intel Corporation
(858) 391-4570
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-sec@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
[mailto:owner-stds-802-sec@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG] On Behalf Of Paul Nikolich
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 3:16 PM
To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [802SEC] Contention-Based Protocol Study Group Next Steps
Dear EC members,
As we agreed at the March closing EC meeting the activities of the
Contention-Based Protocol Study Group should be communicated across all
WGs
to keep them informed of their progress. Attached are the minutes of
yesterdays telecon (thanks Peter for getting these out so quickly.) If
you
have any questions or concerns please contact Peter Ecclesine directly.
Regards,
--Paul Nikolich
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Ecclesine"
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 4:49 PM
Subject: Contention-Based Protocol Study Group Next Steps
From 802.11-05/336r0, minutes of 13 April telecon:
Next Steps
With the review of the relevant documents and regulations, the SG has
completed at least the first pass of items one and two of its scope (see
document IEEE 802.11-05/0223r0). The SG scope may be summarized as
follows:
1. Identify technical scope
2. Determine impacts on IEEE 802 standards, for example:
a. Co-channel sensing requirements
b. Definition of 'contention-based protocols'
c. Signaling of enablement to mobile stations
3. Decide whether a TG is needed, and if so define PAR and 5 Criteria.
Participants were requested by the chair, Peter Ecclesine, to provide
contributions for the next meeting to address item 3 of the scope and to
assist in deciding if a TG is needed and, if so, some possibilities for
PAR and criteria. These contributions should include discussion of the
need and advisability of further work in 802, what aspects of 802
standards may be impacted, and how 802 might proceed to address the
opportunity (if needed).
Peter will prepare the next agenda based on contributions received, and
participants are urged to submit their papers early to ensure inclusion.
==
I will spend some time next week discussing QoS in non-exclusively
licensed bands, but after that am ready to ask the group about PARs in
.11 and .16 (because .16h is titled License-Exempt) that share most of
the Five Criteria.
Comments or questions?
petere
Peter Ecclesine, Technology Analyst, New Markets & New Technologies
MS SJ-10-5 170 West Tasman Dr, San Jose, CA 95134-1706
Ph 408/527-0815, FAX 408/526-7864
"Time doesn't fool around." "Without Prejudice" U.C.C. 1-207
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This list is maintained by Listserv.
11-05-0336-00-0000-cbp-sg-telecon-minutes-13-april.doc
11-05-0331-00-0000-cbp-sg-telecon-minutes-6-april.doc
11-05-0328-01-0000-coordination-contention-interference-resolution.doc