RE: 15.4b CA document: annex or standalone?
Robert,
Sorry for late reply, I was out last week.
I think having the CA documents as a standalone document is
easiest. There is no reason it has to be an annex, unless of course you
want to do that.
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Poor [mailto:rpoor@ieee.org]
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 7:31 AM
To: Shellhammer, Steve
Cc: stds-802-19@ieee.org; STDS-802-15-4B@listserv.ieee.org; Monique
Brown
Subject: 15.4b CA document: annex or standalone?
Steve:
[Work on 15.4b sub-GHz CA document proceeds apace: we're verifying the
SNR/BER curves for each of the sub-GHz PHYs, since all other
calculations depend on the BER curves.]
We have a question for the .19 team: do you expect the CA document to be
a standalone document, or an expansion to the existing Annex E?
Our editing team prefers a standalone document, since it's easier to
create and edit. But we're prepared to expand Annex E if appropriate.
Thanks!
- Rob