RE: Information of PER for shared antenna? -- missing 802.15.2?
I guess because TG2 ended several years ago.
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: stds-802-19@ieee.org [mailto:stds-802-19@ieee.org] On Behalf Of
Tom Siep
Sent: Sunday, April 09, 2006 5:26 PM
To: owner-stds-802-19@listserv.ieee.org
Cc: stds-802-19@ieee.org
Subject: Re: Information of PER for shared antenna? -- missing 802.15.2?
Hi Steve,
I just went looking for 802.15.2 at http://ieee802.org/15/pub/TG2.html
and the link does not seem to be functional. Any idea why it is not
online?
Tom
Tom Siep wrote:
> Thanks Steve,
>
> For reasons not clear now (but clear then) I was specifically not
> allowed to be associated with 15.2 by my employer, and I never went
> back and studied it later. I'll check it out.
>
> I suspect the AWMA is a bank-switch signaling mechanism, which I think
> is already being used. I'll verify, but what I believe is being asked
> is being asked is any data/analysis on induced errors because of
> proximity of another transmitter.
>
> As far as Bluetooth and 11n are concerned, it may well be that the
> Bluetooth SIG as an organization is not interested in the interaction
> with 11n, but some of the members definitely are. I will see what
> interest I can generate from Cambridge about participation in the
> analysis.
>
> Tom
>
> Shellhammer, Steve wrote:
>
>> Tom,
>>
>> Back in the old days, IEEE 802.15.2 had a coexistence mechanism
>> called "Alternating Wireless Medium Access" (AWMA). It is a simple
>> technique and it allows sharing of an antenna.
>>
>> By the way, did the Bluetooth SIG ever want to discuss AFH and
>> 11n? I sent an email to John Barr but never heard back.
>>
>> Steve
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: stds-802-19@ieee.org [mailto:stds-802-19@ieee.org] On Behalf Of
>> Tom Siep
>> Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 1:36 PM
>> To: stds-802-19@ieee.org
>> Subject: Information of PER for shared antenna?
>>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> I was asked if there is any data or analysis available for
understanding
>> issues involved with the design of an RF front-end for a Bluetooth
chip
>> and a 802.11 chip to share an antenna.
>> They have asked for some information about the effect of interferer
>> dot.11 signal strengths on Bluetooth bit error rates to help optimise
>> the design.
>>
>> Any thoughts?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>