RE: Vote in EC Meeting

["Shellhammer, Steve" <sshellha@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I had a typo in my email.  The rules were approved in November 2004.

 

Steve

 

---

From: Shellhammer, Steve
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 2:33 PM
To: 802. 19 TAG (stds-802-19@ieee.org); Aik Chindapol (aik.chindapol@siemens.com); Carl Stevenson (carl.stevenson@ieee.org); David Cypher (david.cypher@nist.gov); Guenter Kleindl (guenter.kleindl@siemens.com); Ian Gifford (giffordi@ieee.org); John Barr (john.barr@motorola.com); Joseph Levy (Joseph.Levy@InterDigital.com); Mark Austin (Mark.austin@ofcom.org.uk); Michael Lynch (mjlynch@NORTELNETWORKS.COM); Nada Golmie (nada.golmie@nist.gov); Robert Heile (bheile@ieee.org); Shellhammer, Steve; Sheung Li (sli@sibeam.com); Steve Whitesell (swhitesell@vtech.ca); Stuart Kerry (stuart@ok-brit.com); Tom Siep (tom.siep@ieee.org)
Subject: Vote in EC Meeting

 

IEEE 802.19,

 

At the EC meeting Mat Sherman put up a motion for the EC to support the 802 Chair’s email stating that project that have not started working group letter ballot before November 2002, when the coexistence rules were established, have to produce a CA document.

 

            Here is the original email from Paul,

 

            http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/secmail/msg06274.html

 

            So officially, the only projects that are required to generate a CA document are those that indicate so in their PAR.

 

            However, many of the members who voted against Mat’s motion did so since Paul’s email was poorly worded (it did not say only wireless for example) stated that if a wireless standard with unlicensed operation came though the EC that did not produce a CA document, they could very easily vote against it.

 

Steve