| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Nancy, Incumbent protection is the fourth possible
deliverable, ·
An IEEE 802.19 document on harmonized mechanisms to protect
broadcast incumbents in TV white space Regards, Steve From: Nancy Bravin
[mailto:nbravin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] All, Since we are talking about collaboration, coexistence, 802 and non
802 devices, are we not going to consider Incumbent protection, and security in relation to all of these
areas? It is hard to coexist without it, in my opinion. From: whitespace@xxxxxxxx
[mailto:whitespace@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Winston Caldwell Steve/Mark, While I had assumed that 802.19 might focus only on 802, I didn’t
mean to suggest – only to clarify for myself. Thanks, Winston From: whitespace@xxxxxxxx
[mailto:whitespace@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Shellhammer, Steve Mark,
Comments below. I think it will useful to discuss these further on
tomorrow’s call. Steve From: Mark Cummings [mailto:markcummings@xxxxxxxxx]
Steve, I proposed by email before the call, discussed on
the call and received support for including: 1.)
Collaboration. If coexistence is understood to
include collaboration, then I am OK. SJS> My
personal opinion is that coexistence mechanisms could either include
collaboration or not, depending on the technique. So I am fine with
collaborative coexistence techniques. 2.)
Use Cases. If scenarios is understood to mean Use
Cases, then I am OK. SJS> I am not sure if
they are the same or not. I think Use Cases are descriptions of how the
networks are used. I think information is useful in a coexistence
scenario. However, Use Cases can be separate when they focus on the
utility of the network, how it is used, what services are provided, etc.
So if the focus is more on how the networks are used and not specifically
focused on how they coexist, then I would consider this a separate topic. 3.) Non 802. If TV White Space Networks is understood
to include non 802 devices, then I am OK. SJS> To me
“TV white space networks” could include both 802 and non-802 network.
However, Winston suggested that it be just 802 networks. Hope these clarifications are helpful, Mark Mark Cummings, Ph.D. +1 650 854 4406 Managing Partner, enVia Technology Partners, Inc. Chair, Use Case Ad Hoc, IEEE P1900.5 Special Member Board of Directors SVC Wireless (Silicon Valley
China Wireless Technology Association) Member Special Committee, Technical Committee of Software Radio,
IEICE, Japan On Apr 13, 2009, at 1:08 PM, Shellhammer, Steve wrote: All,
I currently have the following set of potential deliverables on TVWS
coexistence, · An IEEE 802.19 document on
coexistence scenarios of TV white space networks · An IEEE 802.19 document on
coexistence metrics for measuring the level of coexistence between TV white
space networks · An IEEE 802.19 document on
coexistence mechanisms for enhancing coexistence between TV white space
networks · An IEEE 802.19 document on
harmonized mechanisms to protect broadcast incumbents in TV white space Were any other possible deliverables proposed on last
week’s conference call? I will put together a short straw poll on whether these should
be Study Group deliverables. Before I run the straw poll I just wanted to
see if I should add any other items to the list. Thanks, Steve From: Shellhammer,
Steve [mailto:sshellha@xxxxxxxxxxxx] IEEE 802.19 TVWS Coexistence SG,
I have been thinking about the best way to agree on a set of
deliverables. I recommend the following process. 1. Select a set of possible
deliverables – This can be done on next week’s conference call via email
reflector 2. Straw poll each of the
possible deliverables to see if there is support for making it an actual
deliverable – This can be done via email. I recommend on next week’s conference call the SG develop the
“List of possible deliverables.” I will not be on the call so Ivan will
run the call. Here are my suggested deliverables, · An IEEE 802.19 document on
coexistence scenarios of TV white space networks · An IEEE 802.19 document on
coexistence metrics for measuring the level of coexistence between TV white space
networks · An IEEE 802.19 document on
coexistence mechanisms for enhancing coexistence between TV white space
networks On next week’s call and via
email please decide on any other “potential deliverables.” I would expect
all the deliverables to be documents of one form or another, but someone may
have another idea of a good deliverable. Ivan or Mark can then email me
any other potential deliverables. After we have such a list I
will run an email straw poll to see how much support there is for each of
these. This is just a straw poll so we need to think about how much
support is needed to decide that the SG wants to develop such a
deliverable. I will recommend that we only develop deliverables that
receive 75% support. If there is less support than that I would say that
development of such a document would be optional. I don’t want to commit
to developing something that has marginal support. Regards, Steve From: whitespace@xxxxxxxx [mailto:whitespace@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Shellhammer, Steve All,
On tonight’s call we discussed the draft TVWS coexistence plan,
We will continue that discussion on next week’s conference call.
If you have comments on the plan you can also make those comments on the 802.19
email reflector. If you are not already on the email reflector you can
join here,
If you have comments on the plan please be specific regarding what changes you
would like to make to the document. You can recommend adding text,
changing text or removing text. Please specify what changes you would
recommend. That would enable others to comment on your recommended
changes. Regards, Steve |