| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Tom, Thanks for all
your kind words regarding my secretary work. I will produce a
revised version of the minutes and post them. Steve From: Thomas Kolze
[mailto:tkolze@xxxxxxxxxxxx] Steve, your minutes are "most excellent".
"awesome." Near the end you mention: "Tom K. - Sections 4 and 5 may not be sufficient. He
requested that the contribution be listed on what changes were made. Tom
suggested that the contribution numbers and abstracts be added." "Mark suggested keeping the wording less." "Tom K agreed that for this section it may not work." I believe what follows is a more accurate summary, and that
the small addition of detail I am proposing adds clarity and
value in addition to being accurate --- "Tom K. - Sections 4 and 5 may not be sufficient. He
requested that the contributions which are mentioned as having
been submitted to the group be explicity referenced, at a minimum.
Tom suggested that the contribution numbers and abstracts could be added to the
sections." "Mark explained that the contributions to the group which are
being refered to in these sections, which describe the Technical
Feasibility and Economical Feasiblity, were presented as part of the
presentations at the tutorial sessions at a previous meeting. Mark
suggested keeping the wording in these sections less." "Tom K agreed that for this section, simply adding the
abstracts verbatim may not work." Thank you for your consideration of this suggestion. And again, great job on the minutes. later, tjk PS The date in the Header is given as "September 2008". I propose changing this to "September 2009", believing
this change to provide a more accurate representation. I
humbly request that you consider this change in addition to those above. From: Shellhammer, Steve
[mailto:sshellha@xxxxxxxxxxxx] The minutes from today’s TVWS Coexistence call have been
posted, Steve |