| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
If anyone has any comments on the 802.1 draft please provide them to me and I will submit them. Thanks, Steve From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List ***** [mailto:STDS-802-SEC@xxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Tony Jeffree Apparently in the clean draft (
802-rev-D1-5.pdf), the PDF page numbering and the draft page numbering did not align. I have fixed this in the draft uploaded here: Please address comments to this version of the draft, not the previous version, and not the version with change markings. Thanks -
On 6 September 2012 09:14, Tony Jeffree <tony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: NOTE: ALL BALLOT RESPONSES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE NEW BALLOT RESPONSE LIST: PLEASE! This Email is attached to an official 802.1 Working Group recirculation ballot form for P802-REV/D1.5 - Overview and Architecture. As this is a Working Group ballot, only 802.1 voting
members and liaisons are entitled to vote; however, any non-voting participants in the activities of 802.1 may submit a "Comment Only" ballot on the draft. In accordance with established practice in 802 and the IEEE, all comments received, whether from voters
or non-voters, are given due consideration during the Ballot resolution process. NOTE: As this is a formal WG ballot, if you vote "Approve" you are stating that, in your professional opinion, you consider the document to be technically complete, and ready for Sponsor
ballot (i.e., the document is essentially ready for publication, apart from final editing for style, etc.). Hence, sending in an "approve" ballot response within a small number of minutes of the ballot start time cannot possibly mean that the voter has given
the document the level of professional consideration necessary to make such a judgment. I believe the record so far was less than 10 minutes between posting the draft and ballot announcement, and receiving the first "Approve" - and that was on a document That
contained Editor's notes indicating areas where work needed to be done! As this is a recirculation ballot, some different rules apply: - The balloting period is a minimum of 15 days. - The subject matter of the ballot is NOT the entire document; the scope of this ballot is ONLY those changes to the draft that were made in order to resolve the ballot comments on
the previous draft, any ballot resolutions that may have been incorrectly applied, and any ballot comments that may have been rejected. - You need to return a ballot ONLY if you wish to change your previous vote on P802. If you do not return a ballot, your previous vote will apply unchanged. - Responses are particularly solicited from those voters that made Disapprove votes on the previous ballot, in order to confirm whether or not the agreed ballot resolutions address
their concerns. To put it more definitely, if you are an 802.1 voting member who has submitted a previous Disapprove, we will have to hound you until we receive a response. The 802.1 voting members that are entitled to a vote on this ballot are as follows (NOTE: for a WG ballot, the voting population is fixed at the start of the ballot, and does not change
during any subsequent recirculation ballots, regardless of any membership changes over the course of the balloting cycle): An, Yafan Ao, Ting Ashwood-Smith, Peter Boiger, Christian Bottorff, Paul Brandner, Rudolf Carlson, Craig Cheng, Weiying Congdon, Paul Cummings, Rodney Desanti, Claudio Ding, Zhemin Eastlake, 3rd, Donald Farkas, Janos Fedyk, Donald Finn, Norman Ganga, Ilango Garner, Geoffrey Ghanwani, Anoop Goetz, Franz Gravel, Mark Gray, Eric GU, Yingjie Gunther, Craig Haddock, Stephen Hayakawa, Hitoshi Jeffree, Anthony Keen, Hal Keesara, Srikanth Kim, Yongbum Klein, Philippe Kleineberg, Oliver Krause, Michael li, lin Lynch, Jeff Mack-Crane, Ben Martin, David Messenger, John Morris, John Multanen, Eric Olsen, David Pannell, Donald Parsons, Glenn Pearson, Mark Pelissier, Joseph Raeber, Rene Randall, Karen Roese, Josef Romascanu, Dan Rouyer, Jessy Sajassi, Ali Saltsidis, Panagiotis Seaman, Michael Seto, Koichiro Sharma, Rakesh Shimizu, Takeshi Stanton, Kevin Sultan, Robert Teener, Michael Thaler, Patricia Tumuluri, Chait Vissers, Maarten It should be noted that the ongoing retention of 802.1 voting rights is predicated on active participation in Working Group ballots. Active participation is defined to be returning
ballot forms in two out of the last three Working Group ballots. The 802 Operating Rules allow abstention for any cause other than "lack of technical expertise" to be treated as though it were a failure to respond to a ballot. 802.1 applies this rule. The other (non-802.1) Working Groups are entitled to vote via their WG Chair. The closing date of this ballot is: 23rd September 2012 The PDF file of P802-REV/D1.5 can be found at: A comparison version can be found here: The comment disposition for the previous ballot is here: Username: p8021 Password: go_wildcats If you have any difficulty downloading or reading these files, let me know. As is normal with such ballots, comments should specify not only what problems have been identified with the text, but also what the commenter proposes as a solution. Any comments accompanying the ballot must be presented using either of the templates to be found here: Comments can be generated using Excel or an equivalent spreadsheet program that will read XLS or CSV format files. Attach the resultant file, in XLS or CSV format, to your ballot response
email. RETURNING YOUR BALLOT FORM ========================== Your ballot must be returned to: You are requested to use (exactly!) the appropriate Subject line from the following set when returning your ballot. Please send your ballot with the Subject line explicitly set, rather
than using the Reply function in your mailer. P802-REV/D1.5 - Approve P802-REV/D1.5 - Comments (with approve) P802-REV/D1.5 - Disapprove P802-REV/D1.5 - Comments (with abstain) P802-REV/D1.5 - Abstain Regards, Tony Jeffree 802.1 WG Chair. ****************************** Ballot form follows..... ****************************** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ NOTE: EMAIL ALL BALLOT RESPONSES ONLY TO: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ========================== P802-REV/D1.5 EMAIL BALLOT ========================== TO: James Gilb, Editor, P802 SUBJECT: P802-REV/D1.5 - Overview and Architecture _____ I Approve (may attach non-binding comments below) _____ I Disapprove (must attach binding comments below) _____ I Abstain for the following reasons (may attach non-binding comments below): ______ Lack of Time ______ Lack of Expertise ______ Other: _______________________________________________ ____________________________________________ (Name) ____________________________________________ (Telephone No.) --------------------------------------------------------------------- INCLUDE COMMENTS ONLY AS AN ATTACHMENT, USING THE TEMPLATES IDENTIFIED ABOVE. ---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
|